Black Cat #1Marvel Team-Up #3†*Spider-Gwen: Ghost-Spider #9†True Believers: Amazing Spider-Man #1†True Believers: New Spider-Man #1†True Believers: Spider-Armor #1†War of the Realms: Journey into Mystery #4†*War of the Realms: New Agents of Atlas #3†*War of the […]
Marvel sent over previews of Spidey related books going on sale September 15,2021. What will you be picking up?
Amazing Spider-Man #50Marvel Zombies: Resurrection #3True Believers: Black Widow & the Amazing Spider-Man #1†Captain Marvel #22* †No Preview Available*Possible/Confirmed Appearances Previews Provided By Adventures In Poor Taste Amazing Spider-Man #50 STORY BY: Nick SpencerART BY: […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@Adam Tomlinson
You hit the nail on the head, her name’s Power Princess and it’s Marvel’s version of Wonder Woman, just more violent and less loving.
@Jason
From my understanding It is/was meant to be something of a sequel to the Marvel’s Spider-Man cartoon, as well compliment the opening of the new Disneyland WEB SLINGERS: A Spider-Man Adventure ride, which was the reason it was delayed for so long, they were waiting for the ride to be officially open to the public.
So I would say it’s not canon to the main universe and should be safe to skip until the trade is released.
@Adam Tomlinson
Thanks. Canon I try to stick with purchasing individual issues. Something standalone like this, I may consider purchasing as a graphic novel just to save some money.
Whose the not-Wonder Woman character in Heroes Reborn?
@Jason
I’m not 100% but I think it’s something to do with the Spider-Man cartoon on Disney Plus. The last season I watched ended with Peter, Miles and Gwen starting their own company which I think was called W.E.B.
I think the writer of the comic is involved with the show.
If canon is what you’re after I think it’s safe to skip.
What’s the deal with WEB of Spider-Man? From the preview it looks like it’s geared more towards kids rather than something I need to pick up as part of the canon.