I review the conclusion to Negative in Amazing Spider-Man. While a fun mini story, I take points off as we are shown that May not knowing that Peter is Spider-Man has not been good for the characters. Plus, some other oddities like the return of the Owl in the Kingpin’s good graces and just what do you call the “tender moment” between Norman Osborn and his grandson Normie?
Interesting Tidbit Volume 3 #2: Differing from the normal layouts of comic covers these days, the SPIDER-MAN LOVES MARY JANE covers usually have little to do with the internal story material (though if you study […]
“Listen, we have a problem here. You ever hear the term ‘tipping point’? We’re at that point!” Bendis kills a character he’s already killed! The Tonys have it out! Spidey snacks! And the Hulks re-enact […]
It appears that the symbiote reign of terror on the world is far from over. Although we just recently concluded the “King in Black” mega-event, Marvel is not one to drop the ball on the […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I was really disappointed in the representation of the character of Spider-Man in this issue, particularly when he says he “never had much use for prayers” in one of the panels where Spidey is battling and his “thoughts” are written in the panels.
He’s not a grim and gritty hero. He’s not Wolverine, the Punisher, or Batman.
I thought this was far off from what Spider-Man would ever think or voice. Not very Parker of him.
Any one else have thoughts on this???