Amazing Spider-Man 2001 Annual
PLOT: Mary Jane is back and she and Peter attempt to put their lives back together. She is still spooked by things that remind her of her kidnapping and confinement The couple moves back in with Aunt May and during an intimate moment Peter,as Spider-Man, leaves to thwart a terrorist attack. Left alone Mary Jane ponders their life together and makes a decision about their future.
LIKES: Nice concept but not so nice execution. Sadly that’s about the best you can say of most of Mackie’s run. The idea of devoting an entire annual to the after affects of MJ’s deliverance from the kidnapper is a good idea. The two best things about this annual is that it tries to explore the relationship between Peter and Mary Jane and it is the end of Mackie’s time on this book. Oh, and at least we finally found out what was in that darn box.
DISLIKES: Mackie can’t quite pull it off. Whether or not you agree with MJ’s ultimate decision is irrelevant. The rub is how well the story is done and I just don’t buy it. Just before the emergency at the United Nations is brought to Peter’s attention MJ says, “I feel as though I am where I belong, I feel happy…safe.” By book’s end she’s saying she and Peter have changed so much they can’t go back to the way they were before. And Peter agrees saying he’s known the same thing for awhile?! And just how have they changed? Think back to the start of the Mackie/Byrne debacle. Peter was hiding the fact that he had returned to being Spidey from MJ and she was furious when she found out. Shortly thereafter she boarded the plane to a 16 issue absence. Seems they both forgot all about this. And why would Peter going off as Spidey so profoundly effect her that she would change from saying everything was perfect to feeling she had to leave? Did she forget she had to deal with Peter being Spider-Man? There are ample reasons for Mary Jane to feel she needs time by herself for awhile but they’re not presented here. And as for Joe Bennett’s artwork; I’ve enjoyed it in previous issues but he’s better suited to action issues. A little more subtlety is required in some of the faces and at times the bodies seem strangely contorted. Finally a note to editor Axel Alonso: Anna Watson appeared in Peter Parker: Spider-Man 29 so how could she be in Florida since November?
RATING: out of 4 web-heads and that’s because I’m feeling generous due to the official end of the Mackie era.
HB 56
View articlesYou might be interested in …
Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”
by Hornacek
A therapy session … with Queen Goblin? Chasm, Hallows’ Eve, and Queen Goblin versus … a competent Spider-Man? And the day is saved by … Betty Brant??? Plus the Sinister Six’s plan is revealed and […]
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #593 REVIEW
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN # 593 Writer: Mark Waid Penciler: Mike McKone Inker: Andy Lanning and Karl Kesel Story Title: 24/7 Part 2 Plot Peter takes a shower. Fight in the subway. It’s a trap! Spider-Man vs. […]
Crawlspace Wants YOU to Review #800 in 90 Seconds!
by Mark Alford
OK, Crawlspacers! You are about to pay $10 for a comic – let’s make it worth your while! You’ve read our reviews and listened to them on the podcast. Now we want to hear from […]
Social
Recent Comments
- Aqu@ on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33
- Still Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23
- Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36