These crazy kids need to stop for a minute and take a deep breath.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #37
Published: c. April, 1966?
Cover Date: June, 1966
“Once Upon a Time, There Was a Robot…!”
Plot: Steve Ditko
Script: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Artie Simek
Little did they know,”filling the whole city with Spider-Men” would actually become a possibility several decades later! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #50 Published: May, 1967? Cover Date: July, 1967 “Spider-Man No More!” Writer: Stan Lee […]
That’s the right decision. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #90 Published: c. February, 1984? Cover Date: May, 1984 “Where, Oh Where Has My Spider-Man Gone…?” Writer: Al Milgrom Artist: Al Milgrom Inker: Jim […]
Anyone looking forward to the Morbius movie? 😅 Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #38Published: c. October, 1979?Cover Date: January, 1980 “Curse of the Living Vampire!”Writer: Bill MantloArtist: Sal BuscemaInker: Chic StoneLetterer: Diana AlbersColorist: […]
on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30 on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I figure Ditko for your basic curmudgeon. I wonder if the Objectivism caused that, or amplified it.
This is twice in as many days as I’ve mentioned this podcast, but on the ASM Classics episode covering ASM #39 they spend a lot of time talking about how everybody gets a lot nicer now that Ditko is off the book. It’s really jarring going from #38 to #39 where Flash, Harry, Gwen, and especially Peter were rude, but post-Ditko they’re all either apologizing or thinking “Hey, X is acting differently now, maybe I was wrong about them.”
Ditko’s version of Peter Parker was a real smart-mouth. A mixture of editorial admiration, self-pity, and the needless needling of other people. I think this version of Peter pretty much evaporated as soon as Ditko left the series. However, it makes me see again how totally out-of-whack-with-history Slott’s weak, bungling version of Peter was.
This better be the last page of the current Gwen Stacey series.