Thank dog she brought the wine. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #257 Published: c. July, 1984? Cover Date: October, 1984 “Beware the Claws of Puma!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe Rubinstein Letterer: Joe […]
“He’s already killing people…You knew about this monster, Dad. And now Uncle Ben is dead.“ Having survived Y2K, can the reclusive Peter Parker endure both a super-hero civil war and the hunger of Morlun? Will […]
I’m shaking my webs at it and I think that blurb just might be on to something here! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #24 Published: c. March, 1965? Cover Date: May, 1965 “Spider-Man Goes Mad!” Writer: […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@Evan: I didn’t even notice that. Nice catch.
@Matt: Yeah, Wein was continuing where Conway left off with their relationship, but threw a few hurdles in there that started to complicate things. It’s interesting to think about.
Boy I can see what Gerry Conway had left after his first run end with Amazing 149 (volume 1). Other writers were left with the on and off and mostly unknown relationship between Peter and Mary Jane. I’m betting that this was Queasda’s first look at the character as a man child was, when in reality Wein was trying to help more with Peter’s family problems first and foremost.
Wow, Felicia has nearly the same response in Panel of the Day #580. No wonder Peter was always torn between them.