I think I might actually like this better than the original.
Marvel Graphic Novel (Vol. 1): Amazing Spider-Man — Parallel Lives
Published: c. March, 1989?
Cover Date: May, 1989
“Part 2: Encounters”
Writer: Gerry Conway
Artist: Alex Saviuk
Inker: Andy Mushynsky
Letterer: Rick Parker
Colorist: Bob Sharen
Happy Father’s Day? Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #83 Published: c. February, 1970? Cover Date: April, 1970 “The Schemer!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: Sam Rosen
Back with a vengeance! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #427 Published: c. August, 1997? Cover Date: October, 1997 “Sacrifice Play!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Steve Skroce Inker: Bud LaRosa Letterer: Richard Starkings and Comicraft’s Kiff Scholl […]
Maybe this Spidey guy isn’t so bad after all. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #96 Published: c. February, 1971? Cover Date: May, 1971 “– And Now, the Goblin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Gil Kane Inker: John […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Love this trade. Hands down the best retelling of the origin and showing just why Mary Jane is right for Peter. The art throughout is excellent. Saviuk outdoes himself with the homages to the great artists in the original issues.
It is and DAMN what a great story!!