Tangled Webs: What Spider-Man Story Was Banned From A School Library?

I came across an interesting piece in the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund website. A parent was not happy that her son’s school had a copy of a Spider-Man trade paperback. What story do you think it might be?

Is it Torment, or Shed, or another TPB in which the Lizard eats some people?

Is it Kraven’s Last Hunt, with a cannibalistic bad guy, and a major suicide?

Is it Sins Past with Norman Osborn making a face we never wanted to see?

Is it the Brand New Day TPB with the meth-addicted supervillain?

Is it the “Spider-Man Fights Substance Abuse?” trade paperback, or perhaps a collection of the Lee/ Kane Green Goblin three parter that did not have the stamp of the Comics Code Authority?

If you guessed any of those, it wasn’t that. It was Amazing Spider-Man: Revelations, which collected Amazing Spider-Man Volume 2 #36-39 from the J. Michael Straczynski and John Romita Jr run. The most notable issues included are the September 11 Issue, and the story where Aunt May learned Peter’s secret identity.

As CBLDF reported, a parent thought it was too racy.

Your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man is the last character you’d expect to see swatted off of a school library’s shelves, but that was exactly what happened in 2009 when a parent in Millard, Nebraska protested the inclusion of Amazing Spider-Man: Revelations by J. Michael Straczynski, John Romita, Jr., and Scott Hanna in a middle school library.

According to a story titled Mom Protests Library’s ‘Sexual’ Spider-Man Comic on KETV, a local ABC affiliate:

“My son looked at this and goes, ‘Ohhhh!’” said Physha Svendsen.

She said the book that her 6-year-old son brought home is not age-appropriate for Norris Elementary School students and wants it removed from the library.

“It has a lot of sexual undertones in here, as far as sexuality goes,” she said. “They can learn this through any other place, but it’s not something I allow them to learn, in my house at least.”

Svendsen said she’s actively involved with her four children’s educations and said comic books like the one in question hold little literary value. She said she’s especially concerned about her 6-year-old son, who’s still developing reading skills.

Svendesen didn’t elaborate on the book’s literary elements that she found sexually inappropriate. Some illustrations in the book showed a female character wearing a bikini and a short skirt.

Donna Helvering, head librarian for the district told the news outlet that the library has a thorough selection process that the book had passed, and that it was in demand by other students. Beyond the selection process, the library also has a strong review policy. According to the school’s policy, parents can file complaints and the school is required to form a committee to evaluate the complaint and make a consensus determination to retain or ban the book within thirty days. Unfortunately this measure was not strong enough for Svendsen who told the media, “she plans to hold on to the book that her son brought home while the review process takes place.”

The media appeared to quickly lose interest in the challenge, as coverage of the resolution to the challenge either missed airwaves or was negligible. Fortunately, Norris Elementary School in the Millard School District keeps their library catalog online, and an August 2014 search of the catalog shows that they still have a copy of Amazing Spider-Man: Revelations, although it currently has a status of “out for repairs.” If someone had put it in that status in 2009 just to get it off the shelf and satisfy Svendsen, it’s unlikely the book would have been left it in the catalog this long. More likely it’s just falling apart from use!

The trade paperback included a silent issue from Marvel’s ‘Nuff Said month. Part of the story focused on Mary Jane, bookended by her in a king-sized bed by herself.

There was also a sequence where she has a modeling shoot.

Curiously for an issue banned from a library, one scene in the story has Aunt May gently nudge a student in a library to focus on educational pursuits, rather than racy pictures. 

This would still not have been the issue you expect to receive such parental pushback.

Like it? Share it!
Previous Article

Panel(s) of the Day #817

Next Article

Spidey Kicks Butt:Harry Osborn The Goblin Prince Part 4: Goblin at Rest?

You might be interested in …

2 Comments

  1. I remember reading the story as a kid, my mum would probably have flipped if she’d seen those MJ panels (or the library scene), but it really didn’t effect me at all, women wearing bikinis and short skirts was just a part of life to me. Obviously now, I see the (very successful) sexualization on display, but there definitely isn’t anything too inappropriate for the age-group, I don’t think it’s any worse than what you’d see in several of the big-budget blockbuster films kids love to go and see. I remember my biggest objection at the time was that I thought they’d forgotten to add the speech bubbles… oh, to be a kid again!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *