Eddie Edmends
View articlesAussie writer. Author and Co Creator of Australian comic 'Tick Tock'. Podcast host of Action Figure Blues. Here as a life long comic fan who's favourite characters include Spider-man and Deadpool
You might be interested in …
Alford Notes: ASM #801 – There for You
The end is here, dear readers! So what farewell issue is Slott going to leave us with? Will it be a quiet goodbye to the character and the fans or will it be a one […]
Edge of VenomVerse War Stories #1
VenomVerse kicks off today, but before we can get into the event proper, we have one final issue of Edge of VenomVerse to deal with. The Edge of VenomVerse titles have showcased some strong work […]
Fear Itself #7 – Review
Personal Fear #7 – Monsters, martians, murderers, oh my. So if you haven’t gathered from the first six entries, I’m pretty much afraid of everything. In fact, afraid of so many things that it’s hard […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Aqu@ on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33
- Still Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23
- Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
Is anybody reviewing this title? I only see the post for the first issue.
I liked it, just for the fact the Spidey humor of old was brought back to life. I didn’t see any spoilers ahead of time, so the sister reveal was a shock to me. More shocking is finding out she was mentioned in the graphic novel three years ago. I have no idea why I had never heard about its release. Knowing that kinda sours the direction I thought the book was going to take, assuming Peter still knows who she is.
Yet another disappointing Spider-Man book. That seems to be quickly becoming the norm for the character.
God, what a disappointment.
Peter is again made to look like a fool, gains a love interest that I already don’t care about, and there’s a plot line involving the “sister” I’d hoped was long forgotten. One issue and already I’ve already given up on this title. Maybe the single issue Spider-Man Master Plan will be more diverting.
Too many characters take away from being a peter parker book, I take away the whole mason Antman stuff and go straight to the first date with Rebecca… who I have no interest in but more dialogue… maybe. second back to the roots back in nyc…but let’s go to Chicago on the first issue lol seriously? couldn’t just choose a spot in NY instead?. I’m sick of Peter looking like an idiot. Antman looks better in the MCU…. give him that outfit its bad ass, we don’t need to see comic cartoons faces. and final annoyance Mason knows web shooters more than Spiderman after seeing it on the news… umm what… the issue was refreshing but I still don’t like it. will give it a few more issues. j Scott Campbell covers are awesome! man, if it was MJ over Rebecca, would have been so great.
It is a Marvel directive to have the most popular heroes jobbing to the lesser known ones(and yes, despite the MCU success, Antman and Black widow are not as popular as spidey) , sò no matter how many new spin-off Spidey series Marvel is going to launch, spidey will always be an idiot.
That’s explains the web shooter shenanigans, Peter looking like a fool compared to Black Widow and Antman (Two characters waaay below his level, who he defeated in the past, and yet get his ass kicked).
The day Marvel will publish stories about Peter/Spidey duality and a good fight with some superior foe, I will buy from them.
I didn’t like the first issue. Sure it was funny, but I thought they were going “back to basics” on this. This doesn’t look like that or anything close to it. I’m going to give it three more issues and then I’ll decide if I drop it or not.
I really do like the J Scott Campbell covers to them though. Especially the Mary Jane one. In all 4 of those covers, it’s the Mary Jane one that has Peter unmasked smiling. So…yeah, there’s that.
I was really hoping for this to be really good. I like the FCBD version. LOVE Renew Your Vows! Spider-Man, Peter’s character is not about youth, but responsibility and growth as a man, to teach and be an inspiration just like Uncle Ben wanted him to be.
.moderation awaiting is comment Your
You know, the minute they trot out the line “Because you demanded it” should be the minute you drop the book like a bad habit.
I pretty much agree with you here – at times it did drift into too much humor, but I did like the introductions of the new characters enough for me to stick around for a bit longer. The team-up aspect is something I hope doesn’t stick around for much longer.
..Am I the only one who thinks Peter going for Rebecca is OOC?
I don’t mean in a ‘MJ is right there dude’ kind of way.
I mean…doesn’t dating a woman as Spider-Man mean that he can’t really be himself, risks comrpmizing his identity and worse make her an obvious target? Like as Peter Parker he can at least go out with someone and it’d be fine, most people don’t know who he is. But everyone knows who Spider-Man is. They can’t do much in public meaning they’d have to have dates that are out of the ordinary…which is you know…kind of not what the guy looks for in a lady?