From “Amazing Spider-Man” issue 12. Oh boy, where to begin? Jameson’s “proof” that Spider-Man is dangerous is because…real life spiders are dangerous? Peter thinks that he if (a science geek) displays any knowledge of spiders, people will connect the dots? And that last panel is pure Ditko.
Ned Leeds, a supporting character I kind of miss, goes out like a wimp in "Amazing Spider-Man" issue 289.
Didn’t we just have one-shot like this? Betty’s comment is helps with a constant debate that comes up among fandom. No Cissy, Peter doesn’t remember you and neither do any of the fans. Mary Jane’s […]
Peter Parker: Spider-Man (volume 2) issue 21. Peter has always been a funny guy. He creates banter in tense situations and his battle humor has been a long staple of the Spidey books. In this […]
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “As someone who read this in the realtime, I enjoyed Sandman’s evolution from villain to non-villain to Sable employee to…” Apr 27, 09:31 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “Ok, ok – I’ll wear my glasses next time I respond…” Apr 27, 09:21 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t know who anything about this Laden so I have no opinion on their art.” Apr 27, 09:19 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t care one what of the other about Sandman. I just really hate Laden’s art. Always have.” Apr 26, 21:32
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I love the Billy Graham reference…
This strip comes shortly before his unmasking by Doc Ock. Both are from issue #12. This strip is from page 4. He’s unmasked by Ock on page 8.
But it wasn’t his first fight with Ock (that happened in issue #3).
(I just happened to have the Complete Amazing Spider-Man DVD already in my computer – so was simple to check)
I think it’s after. I have Essential Spider-Man vol.1 next door so I’ll reference that to confirm.
Maybe Peter just didn’t want to get carried away in talking, such things happen in real life
But Jonah Jameson needs an expert on arachnids to make a fool of him
Is this strip from before his first fight with Ock or after?
This reminds me that Harry knew of the incident of unmasking Pete in this issue and he believed Peter was acting as a fool, in the 90s Harry was in his full mentality not affected by drugs when he remembered Peter is Spider-Man while looking at him departure after Spider-Man gave him a talk on how it isn’t simple to be a superhero, too bad Harry didn’t remember this incident at that time