Amazing Spider-Man writer Dan Slott recently told a poster at the Comic Book Resources Spider-Man forum to go F-themselves. A poster by the name of lejayjay had a snarky comment about Slott saying It is jus […]
Update *2 – I’ve added more titles to the lists below UPDATE Something seems to be missing from the month For those wondering about Amazing Spider-Man, this could simply be a break and they will […]
Here comes June 2017 and with it more secret empires, an end of a friendship and a new ‘superior’ look for Ock! SECRET EMPIRE #4 (of 9) NICK SPENCER (W) • LEINIL FRANCIS YU (A) Cover […]
on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “As someone who read this in the realtime, I enjoyed Sandman’s evolution from villain to non-villain to Sable employee to…” Apr 27, 09:31 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “Ok, ok – I’ll wear my glasses next time I respond…” Apr 27, 09:21 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t know who anything about this Laden so I have no opinion on their art.” Apr 27, 09:19 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t care one what of the other about Sandman. I just really hate Laden’s art. Always have.” Apr 26, 21:32 on Arachnid Analysis: Reflections of a Jackal: “I wonder why Professor Warren has aged so suddenly!” Apr 26, 04:34 on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #2/966: “Ryan, I think I figured of what bothers me with this run so far – we are getting Peter, Which…” Apr 24, 21:01
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Bridged?
That would be a horrible cop-out. The clone thing is outplayed at this point. Fans were in an uproar about Peter possibly being a clone. Imagine the backlash (probably to a slightly lesser extent) if the Gwen who died was a clone.
Everything I’ve been told is wrong…. so does that mean that the entire run so far is nonexistent? My job just got so much easier!
I think I side with some comments I’ve read on forums in that what we “knew was wrong” is two things
1. That P.I’s post-SW success can be attributed to Ock boosting it’s networth (thus putting all the credit back into his hands and not Peters’)
2. That Gwen Stacy NEVER died, and that the one who had the kids with Norman and was bridged was a clone