It seems IGN is giving it a 7.7 out of 10. What are your 2 cents?
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Everything Wrong With Spider-Man 3
I still defend Spider-Man 3, but I gotta give this guy credit for a creative video. It’s good for a few laughs.
Talk Nerdy to Me With Black Cat
First the Screen Team taught us how to make a Spider-Bra, now they are talking Nerdy. Check out this fun video.
13 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
The first game was cool but I have no interest in playing a game based on a story I already read (Civil War) for the same reason why I don’t play any video games based on movies. I already know how it ends and if I want a story to end differently than I’ll just go read fan fiction or a “What If” comic.
Marvel vs. Capcom 2 and Batman Arkham Asylum are all the comic book games I need at the moment.
Gotta say I’m pretty disappointed. Finished the campagin on anti-reg, the games about half as long as the first one. Without giving spoilers the third act is pretty tedious and totally nonsensical. The much ballyhooed 200+ avalible fusions are all just variations of a few themes, not really 200+ unique moves. Oh and finally, instead of the 3 unlockable costumes (with stat changes, etc) per character we now have only one and those are really just skins, altering nothing about your character other than the apperance.
Spider-Girl: Mine hasn’t frozen at all, if that’s any consolation. BD may have a case of the Parker Luck. 😉
UGHHH!! I hate typos………..I meant better not bette.(sigh)
WHAT?! Are you serious? It froze on the first play through?! Ugh…I should have gone with Uncharted…I guess I’ll see what happens tomorrow night…
I bought the PS2 version of it just because it’s $30 cheaper than the PS3 version. It was okay. I think I’d give it a C. The PS3 one would probably look bette. I agree with BD though….Batman does deserve an A.
Thanks BD, now I know to skip out until a price drop is made… =)
Well I played it for a couple hours last night. I’m like eh with it. I think my expectations were too high. Within 15 minutes of playing Arkham I was like woah, this is so cool. However, this one is very much a repeat of the first one. I just got through Latveria and am in the underground tunnels and rescuing Ms. Marvel. It froze up on me last night so I quit. So at this point I’m giving it a B-, Batman gets an A.
if its just like the first one then I’m not that interested because the original ultimate alliance was inferior to x men legends 2
I cannot really fully comment until I play it (where are you Thursday?) but I do have to say that the cinematics from the first one look much cleaner and well put together. I’m not sure if Activision was just slacking off on them this time around or what.
IGN always rant reviewing comic based games
I’ve played the game for a couple of hours now (co-op with a friend), and I am enjoying it quite a bit. There are tons of things to unlock. I think this IGN review is pretty fair. 7.7 sounds about right, although Marvel fans like ourselves will probably bump that score up a bit thanks to our fandom. Looking forward to playing with the rest of you PS3 Crawlspace gamers! 🙂
It looks great. I really don’t know what this guy’s problem is, but I want this game bad!