According to Comicbookmovie.com – yes, played by Colm Feore:
(Potential spoilers at the first link above)
We’ve managed to confirm that Feore will be playing a character from classic Spidey lore in Marc Webb’s sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man. Plus, find out how this character ties in with the film’s villains to…well, you’ll have to click for more!
There’s not much else on this right now other than rampant Sinister Six speculation.
–George Berryman!
One of Spidey’s oldest allies has his Netflix series debut today and in addition to showcasing one of Spidey’s oldest enemies, the Kingpin, it’s also got Leland Owlsley – aka the Owl! Old Leland has […]
(Marvel Press Release)Meet SPIDER-BOY in next week’s SPIDER-MAN #7! New York, NY— May 31, 2023 — Earlier this month, Marvel Comics teased a stunning character debut in Dan Slott and Mark Bagley’s SPIDER-MAN #7, and now […]
Marvel sent over previews for Spidey books coming out on August 2nd, 2023. What will you be picking up?
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
‘ Every online shopping website has to be encrypted.
Provided shipping of goods is handled in an eco-friendly manner, the effects of
shopping online can be even more positive. Similarly, you can evaluate some the design and pattern of the
best wedding dresses to impress the onlookers by hiding your imperfect body parts.
Spider-man has always been a backdrop for the soap opera of Peter’s life. In the earlier issues (and Ultimate) they had a teen angst serial going over a multi-issue arc while Spidey fought a different villan every issue or sometimes two. I am hoping the movie follows that formula. Thats where SM3 failed.
@#10 Very true. That’s a good point.
As much as it feels overstuffed, people keep forgetting that these villains were never massively fleshed out, and superhero movies need to learn that, sometimes, a superpowered crook can be a superpowered crook. We don’t need him to have an emotionally powered backstory, and we can introduce him as a guy just turning up to give Spidey something to tussle with as a ‘day in the life of Spidey’ moment. Hell, Ultimate Spiderman pulled this off constantly, and was able to introduce villains such as the shocker in this way without overstuffing the storyline.
>tt<
Like we need a third villain for this movie
The Vulture? Absolutely! Rather in the third than in this one, but either way I want to see Spidey and Toomes battle it out above New York …
Please no. The only way Vulture should make it into this movie is a passing reference at best, or maybe a collage of a battle while the opening titles roll.
I was going to say Don is officially against this movie.
What? NO0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0OO00O00!!!!! Not the Vulture!
I think the Sinister Six COULD work in a Spider-Man movie, but only if they were set up properly, over a few films…like they did with the Avengers.
But I don’t know about this rumor. We’ve already got Electro, Rhino, and (possibly) the Goblin…introducing another villain just sounds like overkill.
That being said, this guy does have the look of the Vulture though.
So I take it you dont want a Sinister Six in neither this or the next film? I´m also a bit worried this film will be over-stuffed already, but I´m gonna try and stay positive as long as I can. And this Vulture thing is still a rumour right?
Yes, because overstuffing your sequels with villains always works well for superhero film franchises.
I saw they also had started the rumor that there were set pics of Norman Osborn as the Goblin, but I think thats false, it would also be smarter to just introduce these guys in their civilian identities, and then bring them in as Sinister Six in the 3rd film. Let Electro shine in this one(no pun intended).