Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Amazing Spider-Man #15 Ryan’s vidcast Review
I review Amazing Spider-Man #15, the conclusion to Power Play. While I point out a few nice things about the issue, its a conclusion riddled with bad transitions and characterization. Also, just because […]
Ryan’s vidcast review of Amazing Spider-Man #14 and All-new, All-different Avengers #10
After a long hiatus of Read’s Reads, I return with a review of Amazing Spider-Man #14 and All-new, All-different Avengers #10. While I enjoyed Avengers very much, I really don’t know what to make […]
NBC Nightly News Coverage of Spider-Man Injury
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
15 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
every movie has faults. people like to say “why is everyone bashing the Raimi films all of a sudden?” well, we now have multiple adaptations of spider-man in cinema, thus something to compare the original films.
I sure like the Raimi movies (except for the 3rd movie) but everyone has to admit, the peter & mj scenes sure were awkward and tedious, also that the Raimi movies were veeeery campy. On the other hand, ASM tries way too hard to be modern and be different from the other movies at times, still a very good spidey movie, I’m sure all the new plot points like Pete’s parents and that mysterious guy at the end will be developed further in the 2nd movie.
How is sniffing hair a fetish? Relatives do this. It’s bizzare, but some can pinch your cheeks, hug you but it’s bonding. The score is hilarious.
…Well, shoot. I like ALL the movies. Clearly, I’m wrong.
I can appreciate your frustration with that shift in opinion. haters and trolls just seem to pop out of the woodwork every time it becomes cool to bag on something. but then I just remember…. http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSa6NrACHPOK8ExxHB_CUmlInMygUhVfSPE9bGknahi3sTWCKJpzw
@Regless I respect your opinion but I completely disagree with you. Everyone loved the first two Spider-Man movies when they came out and now all of a sudden just because another Spder-Man movie comes out by someone else quite a few people are trashing on the Raimi films for no good reason which I find really disrespectful as they had nothing but heap and praise when they first came out.
@Regless: This horrible Sandman-Twist happened in Spider-man 3.
Spider-man 3 is like Star Trek – The Motion Picture 1 : “Don’t talk about it, maybe it will go away and will be forgotten.”
Sorry for double post. But I remembered in the Raimi films The true killer of Uncle Ben turned out to be the Sandman. So you can’t really fault ASM for not catching the killer anymore than the Raimi films. of course that doesn’t take away from the personal growth Peter went through when he caught the alleged killer. The Same growth was experienced by peter in the ASM movie and was better developed even if it was handled in the most awkward way possible. I still have no idea what Webb intends to do with the escaped killer but hopefully we’ll find out in the next movie.
@Blaze: If this movie is a disgrace to the spider-man franchise I guess that would make the Raimi’s films abominations… I don’t agree with that for either set of movies since they both had strong and weak points. And many of these points were really stretches or inaccurate. Like missing when Uncle Ben fiddled with the rubrics cube. You are right on some major points though (Uncle Ben’s death in the next response.) And so if you know there’s a giant dangerous lizard out there you should totally not try to tell anyone? Sometimes doing the right thing means looking a little crazy. Spidey’s never been overly concerned about his rep anyway. Remember in the awesome nineties cartoon when he tried to warn Felicia he thought something had happened to Morbius? Same thing here.
@Kuder: The Raimi films were pretty bad even before ASM came out. Don’t get me wrong. The wrestling background, The Osborns (With the exception of Hover-board Harry). Doc Ock. The Raimi films did a lot of things right. The main thing I agree with you on is Uncle Ben’s death. It’s like ASM was trying way too hard on a simple defining concept. And because of that it’s left muddled and convoluted. Peter didn’t lose his guilt about what happened to Uncle Ben when he caught the killer, but he did lose his anger. And redefined his sense of responsibility. Also, as many other pointed out. we didn’t need another origin story. Heck none of the best spidey cartoons ever did the origin.
The reason why i still dislike the Raimi movies intensely is simply because Peter and MJ were consistently terrible in every movie. Uncle Ben’s death scene would’ve been deeply touching if not for Tobey’s acting.
I loved The Amazing Spider-Man and I prefer it over the Sam Raimi films, but this video is extremely true besides the first point. It also forgot the “But those are the best kind” line. Overall, funny video
Uh, Peter figured out the security touchpad because he’s a science nerd and it was rearranging the correct sequence of a certain atom or molecule.
Kuder loving your quick points on what made the Sam Raimi movies so great. It really annoys me that so many people are turning on the original Spider-Man films now when Spider-Man 2 is still classed as the best and most well recieved one. Did we really need another origin film when Raimi told it better. When Uncle Ben died in the first Spider-Man film it felt emotional and powerful. In Amazing Spider-Man I felt nothing but relief when it happened. Martin Sheen’s Uncle Ben came off as quite a moany old man. Peter didn’t even catch the crook as you pointed out. I don’t think he learnt the lesson of great power comes great responsibility. It felt like they were trying too hard to bring in a more younger audience. As for Sally Field I thought she was a bit too young to be playing Aunt May and she didn’t feel like one, but she is a nice actress.
For a video trying to point out what’s wrong with the Amazing Spider-Man movie, I find it ironic that they kept forgetting to put the hyphen in “Spider-Man.” Oops. Anyway, the video made me laugh. Nice find!
Blazeatron, i’m with you.
With this new movie, suddenly Sam Raimis movies are soooo bad. ASSHOLES !!!
Costume: Raimi got it right.
Uncle Bens Murderer: In the old movie they did it by the book-capture the man, recognize him and BANG, guilt all over Peter. New Movie: the whole scenerie isn’t ok, Peter’s only out for revenge and THE MURDERER IS NOT ARRESTED YET.
I like Sally Field, but Aunt May she ain’t.
Spiderman is a New Yorker: First Movie – Citizen supporting Spider-man, throwing garbage on Green Goblin was a great Scene.
New Movie – All crans in New York are standing between Spiderman and Osborn-building and get rowed up for him….to much pathos, sorry.
and so on, and so forth…..
REBOOTING IS CRAP.
Very accurate. I’m happy that there is someone out there that didn’t think this disgrace to the Spider-Man franchise was a great film and highlighted some of its many flaws. You forgot the part where Peter starts charging into a police station ranting off to Captain Stacy about a giant lizard roaming New York. Anyone would come off looking crazy if they actually did that!