Previous Article

60’s Spider-Man Internet Craze

Next Article

Spider-Captions # 171

You might be interested in …

21 Comments

  1. If Marvel wants to market to mature audiences, then just say so. Just imagine how much confusion and complaining about the content of the books would stop.

  2. Someone give me an IP check here. I need to know if my apology should stand, or if I should retract it…

  3. Also all the reveals were in the book, not the letter column. This site has been corrected on that point before.

    SW

  4. Phew…thank goodness I’m not responsible for Brad’s kinda weird and kinky imagination. I mean “rape” in a Spider-Man comic…sheesh. Get a grip.

    But keep the double standards alive. It’s very revealing as always!

    Regardless these attempts to be Maxin Magazine for Spider -Man fans seem out of place here.certainly goes against the faux-Puritanical instincts of many of the posters.

    Happy New Year!

    SW

  5. Well, in that case I owe Mr. Wacker an apology. To think someone would go so far just to start some s***…

    Brad, you’re not marekting these to ages 9 and up… why are you bothering with any explanation?

  6. #9- My first ban of 2012 goes to the person impersonating Steve Wacker. The IP was from the Netherlands.

    Oh and Black Cat milk bath was far more sexual than this pic. And lets not forget the Chameleon/Michelle “rape” that was turned into a “make out” session in the letters page.

  7. Heh…Imagine the kvetching and feigned offense around here if we did something like this in the Spidey comics.

    I eat selectively sensitive misogynists for breakfast. Keep it up!

    And Happy New Years, guys!

    SW

  8. Finally, a picture that shows what Mary Jane really brought to the Spider-Man legend! Maybe growing up isn’t so bad, after all!!! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *