Readers of the daily “Amazing Spider-Man” newspaper strip were greeted to this teaser on December 31st. On January 1st we find a younger Peter waking up at his Aunt May’s. Seems to be the writing is on the wall, or newsprint.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Amazing Spider-Man Newspaper Strip Now Daily @ the Crawl Space
Several people have asked me to start posting the strip daily and your wish is granted. I’ll try to do it daily. If I miss a day hopefully some of the staff can post it […]
Spidey Daily Changes
If you’ll notice I’ve taken the Spidey Daily posts off of the front page. I got a call this week from King Features who synidcates the newspaper strip. They asked me to take them all down. […]
18 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Aqu@ on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33
- Still Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23
- Dark Mark on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
there’s now a thread on the message board…
make mine DC! I’d rather have a crisis every 15 years than a deal with the devil with no repercussions!
To Irishlad: I don’t think that it’s a matter of readers, such as ourselves, caring so much about the strip itself. Rather it’s the way this situation keeps being shoved at us. A lot of us feel that the retcon of the character was not needed, especially in the manner that it was done. Now, a year down the road, it’s been done again in the same way it was done before – everything’s changed without real explanation. The difference is that now it’s been done in a different media. That’s what we care about.
Quesada has a great friend and a friend like Mephisto, everything is possible.
Of course you do!
It seems to explicitly be part of a storyline that’ll probably end with still Peter and MJ happily married. Because otherwise there’s no way to explain the sudden development (unless they’re going to hope that the readers of the strip don’t care).
But it’s probably a wise move for Marvel to get rid of the marriage in the comic strip, to make it more consistent with the comics, considering that the comic strip will probably encourage some readers to check out the comics (it’s how I was introduced to the series.) And while some may note that it was a desire to have consistent characterization that led to Spider-Man’s shotgun wedding, I think the marriage was a bad idea for the comic strip, too.
I used to read it daily when it was in the St. Louis Post Dispatch. They took it out about five years ago and I haven’t been following it since. It was mildly entertaining.
So, how many of you actually read the strip? And if not why do you care what happens here?
maybe this is a untold tale of Spider-man story, like they do with Amzing Spider-man family
10 to 1 this is either a plot by Mysterio to find out Spider-Man’s secret identity, or that the past 20 years of the strip have all been a dream a la Bobby Ewing. Either way, this is ridiculous.
That’s not a very nice New Years gift!
I liked what Kevin said.
I bet Stan was waiting for them to discontinue the marrige so he could too lol. Now they can blame Q’ie and say it was his fault that the strip changed too. Pretty smart move…..
Hmm..interesting. Stan is a fan of the new direction of ASM so this would make sense. Then again it could all me smoke and mirrors for something totally different.
Stan is the man LOL!!
QUESADA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
…Why Stan….why…..
*facepalm*