Sony has released a second image from the new movie and also settled on a name. What do you think?
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Previews: July 12th, 2017
Amazing Spider-Man #30 Defenders #3 (Black Cat) Edge of Venomverse #2 Spider-Men II #1 Uncanny Avengers #25 (Shocker) Venom #152 Previews provided by Comic Book Resources Amazing Spider-Man #30 STORY BY Christos Gage and Dan Slott ART BY […]
Slott Teases ASM 700
Amazing Spider-Man writer Dan Slott gave an interview to Newsarama about issue #700. The highlights include this quote What I can clearly say is that in the 20-odd years I’ve been working in this industry, […]
Spidey Solicitations for October 2009
Here’s the solicitations for October 2009. As usual I’ll give my two cents. AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #608 Written by MARC GUGGENHEIM Penciled by Marco Chechetto & Luke Ross Cover by Adi Granov 70th Anniversary Variant by […]
40 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
this movie looks promosing… however even after looking at iron man 2, and the previews for thor and captain america…
marvel movies look better… but still fall short of movies worth watching again..
as long as they get bums on the seats though… aint gonna win no awards.
Ooops…..I missed a word in between “like” and “should”. Insert an “it” there. See? The very thought of this suit causes typing errors.
This costume is the ugliest thing since J. Jonah Jameson. If a ’70s show like The Electric Company could make Spidey’s suit look like should, you’d think Hollywood in 2011 could make it work.
@#17/#35
Great minds think alike. That was the first thing that struck me when I saw this.
I will admit that the picture DOES look cool. However, it doesn’t change the fact that I know what the full suit looks like (Silver Shoes and Codpiece included). So this pic is nothing more than false hope. Nice looking, but I still know what lurks in the shadows of that costume: Bowie Crotch.
That…
looks like the spiderben/ spidergirl(mayday) costume
hmm
best pciture of the suit I´ve seen so far. But yeah, it kinda sucks that it´s just squares instead of a web pattern. And why name it Amazing if the plot is from Ultimate? I mean sure, it´s a good title, but it´s also kinda weird.
The official website for the movie is up. Anyone going to register?
http://www.theamazingspiderman-movie.com/
This looks great!
Everything I see gets me more and more excited.
The only thing I’m unsure of is the retelling of the origin, because think anyone whose going to see it doesn’t know. They don’t retell Bond’s origin every three films. But it looks great!
Still don’t like the costume….
Looks better in this shot, now if only they’ll hide the waist, feet and the line running down his legs through the entire movie. Bad thing is, I’m noticed that the “webbing” on the red parts of the suit are not actually webbing but squares.
If they changed the patterns at the back of the legs and the gloves and removed the weird lines going around the legs and the elbow area, I would be fine with the suit.
It’s a good compromise of “classic” mixed with a few minor tinkers that make it stand alone for the movie. Web shooters look sweet.
Meh, looks like the Ben Riley Spidey costume. I notice they have blocked out the waist and feet.
I like that image!
@24
I concur that costume does look pretty cool.
That costume looks pretty cool. What’s wrong with you people? (I say that with much love, but seriously guys, it’s not crap).
Great name, but that costume still looks like CRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP.
I don’t think its fair to bring up that the silver footies or the blackened crotch in reference to this picture, since it seemed pretty apparent that those were just for on set production, or a result of too much head-humping. Once the camera and the lighting work has been done these are the more likely pictures we’ll be seeing. Like many have said, it doesn’t make up for the front-less belt or the weird design of the stripes down the arms and legs, but I’m really anxious to see how this looks in the trailer, whenever we’re lucky enough to see that.
Looks better here. Still not as pretty as the Raimi suit but I can deal with this. 🙂
I imagine if this picture was the very first image of the suit to be released, the fan reaction would have been a lot more positive. It would have just delayed the inevitable backlash, but still. Anyway, I can’t unsee the “belt”-less waist, the silly red stripes down the legs, and those what-the-heck silver footsies from the on-set pictures, all of which are conveniently covered and hidden in this image. Those are still my biggest problems with the suit, and unless Spidey is going to be running around in that exact pose and lighting for the entire movie, all that tinkering to the suit is still awful. Yeesh, even the web pattern sucks…look at the boots! I’ll still check out the movie, but they better do one hell of a job with the story, acting and special effects, because that’s what its got to take for me to get over this lousy and needless redesign of the suit.
Man, that suit is the only thing keeping that from being a great photo.
Okay, calling the new film “The Amazing Spider-Man” was definitely an appropriate and good idea. As for the costume, again, I like the coloring and the texture of the suit, and I think the best part of the costume is actually the mask–because that’s the few things about the suit which still is faithful to the original. Again, just because one can do a little alterations to the lighting and color saturation to make something look better, it still doesn’t change the fact the filmmakers unnecessary alterations to the pattern of the costume just for the sake of it. And notice how carefully hidden the half-belt, the piping running down the legs, the silver-spur like things on his boots, and especially the blackened crotch-piece are in this pic.
Kind of reminds me of Ben Reilly’s suit.
It would look better if they didn’t screw up the costume.
Im likin the title. and the actress playing Gwen. I like her a lot 😉
Well, the story better amazes me, along with everything else
Woo that’s pretty bad ass!
@Stuart…. its only 9 bucks for a movie around you? im jealous, I’m lucky if I get that price for a matinee in Northern Virginia
His hands are patterned to look like the fingerless gloves we’ve seen him wear in pictures of his civilian persona. I just noticed that.
This new Spider-Man suit looks just as bad as ever. And I don’t like how they clearly reveal the black diamond-like spots on the gloves where Spider-Man needs to tap his fingers in order to shoot his webs. It makes the gloves look even worse. Sure, the webs look raised a bit more and look a bit better in this photo than past pics, but I’m still not going to shell out $9 at my local cinema to see this. Thanks, but no thanks.
Web-Shooters!!!!
If they just got rid of those stupid red streaks on his arm, fixed the gloves, and gave him his belt that suit would be perfect. It would look less “Hollywood” than the Raimi suit but that would make it better. I still love the Raimi suit btw, I’m just sayin.
That image looks pretty sweet…..still don’t care for the gloves, but oh well, everything else looks solid and I’m glad they went with Amazing Spider-man for the title!
I LOVE this image, and the title. Very excited by this.
best thing about this picture: you don’t see the effing shoes!
Looks awesome!!!!
Nice classic name, this bothers me for two reasons though… 1) if they are saying the story for this movie will be more like the Ultimate storyline, why use the Amazing Spider-Man title… and 2) if Marvel ever does get the rights back to this movie, this probably means that they can’t call their movie Amazing Spider-Man, which sucks..
not sure if I’m a fan of that pose in the picture either
My faith in this movie is slowly crawling back (pun not intended.)
Looks more like Spider-Man 2099 than Spider-Man. Meh.