Paul Jenkins did a story after Aunt May found out Spider-Man’s identity which dealt with the ramifications of this moment.
Bertone
View articlesYou might be interested in …
Spidey Memories#62
by Bertone
“Spectacular Spider-Man” issue 51 retconning the aliens from “Amazing Spider-Man” issue 2 even with the “never return to Earth” line. Heck, they even threw in a retconned Mysterio origin for good measrue.
Spidey Memories#50
by Bertone
“The Other” wasn’t the first time Spider-Man went into a web cocoon. This is from “Amazing Spider-Man” issue 392 and Peter is having a bit of a breakdown. When he comes out he declares that […]
Spidey Memories #2
by Brad Douglas
I remember reading this when I was like 8 or 9 and just loving it. Gotta love classic DeFalco and Frenz in the 1980s! It’s a scene from the classic team up in Amazing Spider-Man […]
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
Zachary Joiner on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55
ac on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54
AC on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35
So there is precedence to the One Moment in Time issue where Spidey was KO’d by the brick. Hmm.
That plus how did Aunt May have the strength to knock peter out? Peter can stay conscious after a punch from the Thing, but Aunt May and a vase?
Yeah, in the issue after he’s knocked out he notes on how it didn’t go off because it was Aunt May. But later in the 90s he tells Mary Jane it goes off whenever something is directed at him that could be percieved as a threat, even something like a pillow.
So yeah, the continuity isn’t great…haha.
His spider-sense only warns him of danger. It doesn’t go off if he’s “attacked” by someone he doesn’t consider a threat. Although I’m sure there are many instances where other writers have ignored this rule.
Does Spidey get a No-Prize here for giving a reason why his Spider Sense didn’t go off? lol
Yeah, I remember the Jenkins issue. Loved it.