Gang wars are exhausting.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #288
Published: c. February, 1987?
Cover Date: May, 1987
“Gang War Rages On!”
Writer: Jim Owsley
Artist: Alan Kupperberg
Inker: Jim Fern
Letterer: Rick Parker
Colorist: George Roussos
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1280 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Lonely, but never a loser. Remember that. Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #36 Published: c. December, 1987? Cover Date: March, 1988 “Phreak-Out!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Alex Saviuk Inker: Keith Williams Letterer: Rick Parker Colorist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1644 (Ditko!)
These kids need to cool it a bit with the prejudgment. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #31 Published: c. October, 1965? Cover Date: December, 1965 “If This Be My Destiny…!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko […]
Panel of the Day #293
I wonder what Puma’s up to these days? Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #273 Published: c. November, 1986? Cover Date: February, 1986 “To Challenge the Beyonder!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe Rubinstein Letterer: […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “@Ryan: Please be Mindworm, please be Mindworm, please be Mindworm.” Apr 10, 17:42- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “@Evan Berry: Yeah, that’s a good drawing, but I was looking for something from the comics, likely Stern’s Spec run…” Apr 10, 17:40
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “The mystery villain is some obscured one. Both Lowe and Kelly confirmed it’s a very forgotten villain.” Apr 10, 16:13
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “@Hornacek — The best I could find was an image from an artist’s DeviantArt page: https://www.deviantart.com/green-mamba/art/078-Roderick-Kinglsey-714620486 I’m not sure if…” Apr 10, 14:46
- on 1994 Spider-Man episode #58-“The Price of Heroism” Review: “I didn’t mind “Superman stays out of Gotham” in MCU, but here in these last episodes it’s strange – no…” Apr 7, 13:34
- on 1994 Spider-Man episode #57 “The Six Fight Again” Review: “I liked this one less, because: * hiding keys in the same place from where Chameleon saw you take them…” Apr 6, 08:00
- on May 2025 Solicitations: “I love a good Hobgoblin story. I must say I’m surprised to see that Norman Osborn is still considered one…” Apr 3, 12:34
- on Spider-Previews 04-02-25: “I may or may not have accidentally seen a spoiler for the reveal of who Venom is, and I really,…” Apr 1, 14:13
- on 1994 Spider-Man episode #56-“Secrets of the Six” Review: “I thought last episode Vulture was traitor for taking aircraft alone. And why would any member of Six save the…” Mar 31, 15:59
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
No idea if it was this issue but I remember a Gang War story the was supposed to be 3 parts and went on for 5. The cover of the 5th issue specifically said “Part 5 of the 3-part story” which I felt was a meta-joke that this story had overstayed its welcome and would just not end.