What could possibly go wrong?
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #1
Published: c. January, 1963?
Cover Date: March, 1963
“Spider-Man Vs. The Chameleon”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: John Duffy
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #829
Just a couple of dudes being dudes. Spider-Girl (Vol. 1) #38 Published: c. September, 2001? Cover Date: November, 2001 “A New Lease on Life!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Pat Olliffe Inker: Al Williamson Letterer: John […]
Panel of the Day #950! (Ditko!)
Now that’s a punch! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #13 Published: c. April, 1964? Cover Date: June, 1964 “The Menace of… Mysterio!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Artie Simek
Panel(s) of the Day #908 (Mary Jane Monday!)
A “kindred spirit.” Interesting choice of words… Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #96 Published: c. August, 1984? Cover Date: November, 1984 “The Final Answer!” Writer: Al Milgrom Artist: Al Milgrom Inker: Jim Mooney […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Panel(s) of the Day #1661 (Mary Jane Monday!): “Is that Mary Jane or a Furby? Cause that looks like a Furby.” Apr 17, 17:15- on 1994 Spider-Man episode #62-“The Gauntlet of the Red Skull” Review: “Nothing wrong in damsel in distress if others get into distress too. But I also found it strange that she…” Apr 17, 14:59
- on 1994 Spider-Man episode # 61-“Arrival” Review: “Maybe there were official reality numbers or none given to 90s cartoon and they originally were intended to be one…” Apr 16, 09:31
- on 1994 Spider-Man Double Review-“The Return of Hydro-Man” parts 1 and 2: “Well, it was interesting twist. And there always will be critics, no matter what. I liked seeing Felicia back and…” Apr 15, 10:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “maybe this link could work. https://www.chasingamazingblog.com/2013/09/06/could-this-man-really-be-the-hobgoblin/” Apr 14, 16:25
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “I’m rooting for the return of the Hypno Hustler myself. I liked all the things you liked about the issue…” Apr 14, 14:56
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “@Hornacek – Yeah, I was disappointed that I couldn’t find anything from the actual comics, too. As long as the…” Apr 14, 07:49
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “@Ryan: Please be Mindworm, please be Mindworm, please be Mindworm.” Apr 10, 17:42
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Panel 2 contain a really gigantic leap in reasoning. He’s not wrong, though, if I remember correctly.