I’m afraid Xandu is going to have to present a better argument than “you mustn’t.”
Amazing Spider-Man Annual (Vol. 1) #2
Published: 1965
Cover Date: 1965
“The Wondrous World of Dr. Strange!”
Plot: Steve Ditko
Script: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Sam Rosen
She loves Spider-Man? Sounds like a perfect match to me! 😌 Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #17 Published: c. August, 1964? Cover Date: October, 1964 “The Return of the Green Goblin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve […]
I’m glad we didn’t miss the underworld summit meeting! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #51 Published: c. June, 1967? Cover Date: August, 1967 “In the Clutches of… The Kingpin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: […]
This could only be the work of that dastardly Vibrator character. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #46 Published: c. January, 1967? Cover Date: March, 1967 “The Sinister Shocker!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: John […]
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for…” Jun 21, 04:34 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: So what you’re saying is that Chasm should be able to get the Statue of Liberty to walk…” Jun 21, 04:23
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for whatever…” Jun 20, 23:53
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “By the way, the last time I thought of psycho-reactive goo was Ghostbusters II. “Mood slime.”” Jun 20, 19:56 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: Yeah, I know that Spencer was the one who came up with the idea of Norman’s sins being…” Jun 20, 18:11 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornacek — “Could he have excreted it onto himself and had the same effect that it had on Peter?” Oh…” Jun 20, 17:55 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Geiseric: I do like Peter having a contingency plan in case Norman ever turned evil again, but the gas that…” Jun 20, 15:47 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: I was wondering during TWB’s Powerpoint presentation who among that group didn’t know Spider-Man is Peter. Ms. Marvel…” Jun 20, 15:38 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Joshua Nelson: Yeah, at least the the resolution to the Sinful Spider-Man made sense, given how the sins were put…” Jun 20, 15:32
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “One of the more confusing things is why do they need a plan? Luke beating up Norman isn’t particularly hard.…” Jun 20, 13:56
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher