I review Amazing Spider-Man #45/938 Review the aftermath issue of Gang War. Well, if you want to call it an aftermath, the issue deals more with the aftermath of Fall of X over in the X-Men titles. While I do enjoy the use of Ravencroft and some of the dark elements of the story. The issue seems to throw out subplots that really no one asked for or might be ruining some conclusions in other books. I even talk about Daredevil: Gang War #4 and explain that it really didn’t have much aftermath after Gang War either.
ryan3178
View articlesBusiness and Technology Teacher, blogger and long time comic book collector.
You might be interested in …
The Chi-Town Breakdown: MJ/BC #3 (Volume 2)
THE GIST OF IT… Dark Web was a complete waste of time, but it’s now OVER (Thank God!)…HOWEVER (DAMN IT!)… the finale didn’t show Mary Jane or Black Cat escaping Limbo. That’s a plot hole […]
Amazing Spider-Man #675 Review
by Erik Lexie
The Spider/Carlie team solves the case, we get a brief run-in with Vulture, and many jokes are cracked. In a lot of ways this feels like a standard old school Spider-Man story, which is exactly […]
Amazing Spider-Man (2014) #12 Review: AndrewRoebuck’s Take
Is there such a thing as to many Spider’s? HAS Spider-Verse finally gotten to the point where you start rooting for the exterminators, or are you still rooting for the ragtag group of web-headed wonders? […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
As others have mentioned on the Discord, this is not Legacy 938 – that was last issue. Isn’t there someone at Marvel that is supposed to make sure the numbers that get put on the covers are correct? Whoops.