I review Amazing Spider-Man #45/938 Review the aftermath issue of Gang War. Well, if you want to call it an aftermath, the issue deals more with the aftermath of Fall of X over in the X-Men titles. While I do enjoy the use of Ravencroft and some of the dark elements of the story. The issue seems to throw out subplots that really no one asked for or might be ruining some conclusions in other books. I even talk about Daredevil: Gang War #4 and explain that it really didn’t have much aftermath after Gang War either.
ryan3178
View articlesBusiness and Technology Teacher, blogger and long time comic book collector.
You might be interested in …
Alford Notes: Amazing Spider-Man #32
by Mark Alford
The Green Goblin is back! The one with the capital I after his name, not some knock off version. And this time, he had the power to destroy our favorite wall-crawling hero for good – […]
Amazing Spider-Man #1.4 Review: Stillanerd’s Take
by Stillanerd
“But that’s never happened to me before! Ever! Previously in “Learning to Crawl,” we not only got the story behind why Aunt May doesn’t like that “awful, icky Spider-Man person,” we saw Peter Parker choose […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #27 Review
by ryan3178
I review Amazing Spider-Man #27/921 as the Dr. Octopus storyline kicks off and some of the aftermath of Amazing #26. The interactions between Norman Osborn and Peter are some of the best of the issue. […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Aqu@ on PEPE LARRAZ, JOE KELLY AND JOHN ROMITA JR. BEGIN A NEW ERA OF AMAZING SPIDER-MAN!Auto Draft: “Personally I’m more frustrated by the content of the relaunches than the relaunch itself, but I see where you’re coming…” Dec 22, 05:55
- Big John on PEPE LARRAZ, JOE KELLY AND JOHN ROMITA JR. BEGIN A NEW ERA OF AMAZING SPIDER-MAN!Auto Draft: “Am I the only one who is frustrated with all of the relaunches of ASM? This title should never, ever…” Dec 21, 14:15
- Aqu@ on Spider-Previews 12-25-24: “Nice to see the guest writer addressing how silly and nonsensical all this matter in ASM is. LOL” Dec 21, 06:00
- Gevorg Harutyunyan on 1994 Spider-Man #19-“Morbius” Review: “It’sn2 times, not 4 – original appearance and its original recap don’t count because they were in previous episodes, episodes…” Dec 20, 11:06
- Steve on ENTER THE SPIDER-NAUT!: “Yawn, oh hey another relaunch for for amazing spider man announced today where Peter is broke and looking for a…” Dec 19, 14:40
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Thus spake Todd McFarlane. I have no doubt. [Insert “Old Man Yells at Cloud” meme.] (Incidentally, when trying…” Dec 18, 13:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Evan Berry: (shakes fist at sky) BOB SHAREN!!!” Dec 18, 09:31
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “What’s happening with Peter’s eyes here?” Dec 16, 12:12
- Evan Berry on ENTER THE SPIDER-NAUT!: “Oh no! Things have never looked more bleak! I better buy this comic.” Dec 16, 12:03
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1625 (Mary Jane Monday!): “Aw, I’m glad Kristy got better.” Dec 16, 12:01
As others have mentioned on the Discord, this is not Legacy 938 – that was last issue. Isn’t there someone at Marvel that is supposed to make sure the numbers that get put on the covers are correct? Whoops.