Dang.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #201
Published: c. November, 1979?
Cover Date: February, 1980
“Man-Hunt!”
Writer: Marv Wolfman
Artist: Keith Pollard
Inker: Jim Mooney
Letterer: Joe Rosen
Colorist: Carl Gafford
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1582 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Talk about bad timing! Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #57 Published: c. February, 1995? Cover Date: April, 1995 “Aftershocks, Part 1” Writer: Howard Mackie Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: Joe Rubinstein Letterer: Kevin Tinsley Colorist: Richard Starkings […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1395 (Ditko!)
Where does he get those wonderful toys? Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #17 Published: c. August, 1964? Cover Date: October, 1964 “The Return of the Green Goblin” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1605
Harry may be trying to be a supervillain, but he’s still a friend. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #137 Published: c. July, 1974? Cover Date: October, 1974 “The Green Goblin Strikes!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Ross […]
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Spider-Tracer: Neal Adams: “Woah, I had no idea! Great article as usual. I don’t know why, but I assumed that art on the…” May 13, 21:14- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Zachary Joiner: Right, but wasn’t that a mind-controlled Kinglsey and Ned as Hobgoblins? Controlled by Queen Goblin? I was thinking…” May 10, 06:38
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Evan Berry: Thanks, this depiction of young Peter seems to fly in the face of everything we’ve ever seen of…” May 10, 06:37
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@hornacek – Adam sure knows how to pick ’em.
I looked up April Maye on the Marvel Wiki, and her display pic is literally the third panel above.
I didn’t see the issue number or date at first, so my first thought was, “Wow, I’ve never seen Gwen so mad at Peter before.”
The History section of April Maye’s Marvel Wiki entry consists of only one sentence:
“As Peter Parker was rushing out of his office, April Maye complimented him on his photography, but he was far too preoccupied to respond to her suggestion that they have lunch together.”
Also, LOL at MJ calling Peter April’s “boyfriend” to her face. But April doesn’t clap back at that.