It’s hard having a secret identity. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #96 Published: c. February, 1971? Cover Date: May, 1971 “– And Now, the Goblin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Gil Kane Inker: John Romita Letterer: Artie […]
Look at her go! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #59 Published: c. February, 1968? Cover Date: April, 1968 “The Brand of the Brainwasher!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita and Don Heck Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: […]
Even though she would eventually have a change of heart, I’m not sure if Felicia will ever escape the whole “Black Cat loves Spider-Man, not Peter Parker” thing. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I definitely remember seeing the “I had a headache THIS BIG” commercials.
@Hornacek — Somehow I remember those commercials, though, and I think you’re older than me. At least, I understood the reference — probably through pop culture references like this.
You know, maybe I’m thinking of the “I had a headache THIS BIG” Excedrin commercials.
“Excedrin Headache Number 115”
This was before my time but it sounded familiar. Apparently in the 1960s Excedrin had TV commercials where two people would have an argument and one of them would take an Excedrin. There was an “Excedrin Headache Number ##” on the screen, I guess there were a series of them.
https://youtu.be/SuL7z6zzhYc