Doesn’t he?
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #183
Published: c. May, 1978?
Cover Date: August, 1978
“…and Where the Big Wheel Stops, Nobody Knows!”
Writer: Marv Wolfman
Artist: Ross Andru
Inker: Bob McLeod
Letterer: Jim Novak
Colorist: Janice Cohen
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #251
Unfortunately for this poor sap, he doesn’t stay living for much longer! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #235 Published: c. September, 1982? Cover Date: December, 1982 “Look Out There’s a Monster Coming!” Writer: Roger Stern Artist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #361
Looks like Spidey wasn’t playing around! Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #39 Published: c. November, 1979? Cover Date: February, 1980 “Scourge of the Schizoid-Man!” Writer: Bill Mantlo Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: Jim Mooney […]
Panel of the Day #1020 (Splash Page Sunday!)
What a year it’s been. Amazing Spider-Man Annual (Vol. 1) #1 Published: c. 1964? Cover Date: 1964 “The Sinister Six!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Sam Rosen
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “It’s really funny, Rek-Rap shows up, but it’s Todd Nauck who draws him and this is pretty much most likely…” Jun 23, 00:41- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: If that’s true then this book did a terrible job explaining it. They should assume that everyone reading ASM…” Jun 22, 19:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornaceck- In fairness, Peter and Kamala both worked together in X-Men 30-31. In X-Men 30, they both worked with Norman.…” Jun 22, 18:17
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Geiseric: Yeah, it feels like we’re doing backflips just to explain how Peter can be evil again. It would have…” Jun 22, 16:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “The funny thing is this feels like an extremely convoluted series of events to get Peter back to infected by…” Jun 21, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: Well, Jonah, Connors and Doug know her last name now. At the way TWB is freely calling her “Ms.…” Jun 21, 15:06
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornacek- no, Ms. Marvel’s identity is not publicly known.” Jun 21, 11:39
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for…” Jun 21, 04:34
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: So what you’re saying is that Chasm should be able to get the Statue of Liberty to walk…” Jun 21, 04:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for whatever…” Jun 20, 23:53
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Wait, Spidey was thinking about getting married back in the 1970s? But Peter Parker is eternally young – he wouldn’t do this! The marriage was rushed! etc