Gang wars are exhausting.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #288
Published: c. February, 1987?
Cover Date: May, 1987
“Gang War Rages On!”
Writer: Jim Owsley
Artist: Alan Kupperberg
Inker: Jim Fern
Letterer: Rick Parker
Colorist: George Roussos
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1158 (Ditko!)
It’s been a wild few days! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #11 Published: c. February, 1964? Cover Date: April, 1964 “Turning Point” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel of the Day #1381 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Honesty is the best policy. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #259 Published: c. September, 1984? Cover Date: December, 1984 “All My Pasts Remembered!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe Rubinstein Letterer: Joe Rosen Colorist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #541
Let’s hope nothing goes wrong! Secret Wars II (Vol. 1) #2 Published: c. May, 1985? Cover Date: August, 1985 “I’ll Take Manhattan…” Writer: Jim Shooter Artist: Al Milgrom Inker: Steve Leialoha and Joe Rubinstein Letterer: […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on THE 8 DEATHS OF SPIDER-MAN: “@Michael: Now I need Cytorrak to star in a reboot of the sitcom “8 Simple Rules For Dating My Teenager…” Jul 4, 17:44- on THE 8 DEATHS OF SPIDER-MAN: “My guess is that Cytorrak has gotten human women pregnant somehow.” Jul 4, 17:42
- on THE 8 DEATHS OF SPIDER-MAN: “In my opinion, if you set a flashback story “9 months ago”, the only reason to use that specific amount…” Jul 4, 14:13
- on THE 8 DEATHS OF SPIDER-MAN: “I KNEW that Kelly writing the backup story with Dr. Strange and Peter in issue 50 meant that he would…” Jul 4, 12:00
- on THE 8 DEATHS OF SPIDER-MAN: “Well, since we can’t have Peter’s life continuing on, we may as well kill him 8 times. Why not.” Jul 4, 10:01
- on Tangled Webs: Peter David’s Spectacular Spider-Man Part 3: “Thanks for covering this. Bring back nice memories. PAD was really great already when he started.” Jul 3, 21:08
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Jeff walling: Issue #50 had multiple full page panels (some 2-pages) which I assume they did deliberately because they knew…” Jul 3, 14:47
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “Soooooo why is amazing Spider-Man filled with so many FULL PAGE PANELS?!? I swear each issue has at least 4-5…” Jul 3, 07:06
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: Yeah, I saw that on the Discord. I loved his Deadpool run way back when, so we’ll see. @Paul…” Jun 27, 15:46
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
No idea if it was this issue but I remember a Gang War story the was supposed to be 3 parts and went on for 5. The cover of the 5th issue specifically said “Part 5 of the 3-part story” which I felt was a meta-joke that this story had overstayed its welcome and would just not end.