After two weeks of less pain, I review the conclusion to Joe Kelly and the Dodson’s Spider-Man/Black Cat Date from you nowhere and that’s exactly where it can go. While there is some great dialogue between Black Cat and White Rabbit, that is all. Even the artwork feels phoned in. This is a very, very bad issue and I’m not afraid to say it all.
ryan3178
View articlesBusiness and Technology Teacher, blogger and long time comic book collector.
You might be interested in …
NEW AVENGERS #53 REVIEW
On August 19th, 2009, Marvel will release an original graphic novel titled “NEW AVENGERS VOL. 11: SEARCH FOR THE SORCERER SUPREME.” In an unprecedented promotional move, the company is releasing short sections of the upcoming […]
Spider-Gwen (Vol. 2) #3 Review: Javi’s Take
“Sometimes I just sit and wonder what it would be like to be her–the other Gwen. What it would be like to have a normal life.” Spider-Woman (Earth 65) seeks advice from Spider-Woman (Earth 616) […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-man #72-73 and Sinister War #4 Review
by ryan3178
After a lot of hiccups, I do a super review of the conclusion of Sinister War and the lead in to the Big Amazing Spider-Man #875 as Nick Spencer wraps up his run on […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Thanks Mark. I’m always looking for hope on dark days. We will see what this arc will do. Either way we all will know in a couple of weeks.
Nice F song! Can’t wait for the remix!
You know, I’m feeling strangely optimistic about the upcoming story. I’m quite positive it is unwarranted, but he’s wanted to tell this story for a while now and he’s taking extra time off here (thus the “guest” writer) to, I’m guessing, put his best effort into it. At this point, for you, after 4 Fs in a row, is it possible to enjoy the next arc. Could the next arc make you say that all the weird actions before were actually in character? I think for some readers, the bridge to too far burnt to be redeemed.
Now I don’t know if he WILL to craft a story that makes it worth the crap that came before it, but for whatever reason, I’m ready to give it a chance. If nothing else, we can be done with this six month mystery and move on to something else (hopefully a new Spider-Office).