This is getting serious.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #99
Published: c. May, 1971?
Cover Date: August, 1971
“A Day in the Life Of –”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Artie Simek
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #433
What kind of fiend would do something like this? Spidey Super Stories (Vol. 1) #9 Published: c. March, 1975? Cover Date: June, 1975 “Spidey Fights the Funny Bunny!” Based on the Electric Company Script by […]
Amazing Spider-Man (2018) #33 (Lgy. #834) Review: The Bogenrieder Perspective
Adventures in Sable-sitting, continued, again. Amazing Spider-Man (2018) #33 (Lgy. 834) “Point Blank” Writer: Nick Spencer Artist: Patrick Gleason Colors: Matthew Wilson Letters: VC’s Joe Caramagna Editors: Nick Lowe and Kathleen Wisneski Editor-in-Chief: CB Cebulski
Panel of the Day #1375 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Stay warm out there! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #48 Published: c. March, 1967? Cover Date: May, 1967 “The Wings of the Vulture!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: John Romita Letterer: Sam Rosen
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
What is up with Peter’s face in the second panel? Does he have the mumps? Is he doing duck face 30 years before it was a thing?