Quite a change from five years earlier.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #99
Published: c. May, 1971?
Cover Date: August, 1971
“A Day in the Life Of –”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Artie Simek
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1520 (Mary Jane Monday!)
There may still be some hope for these two. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #21 Published: c. May, 1978? Cover Date: August, 1978 “Still Crazy After All These Years” Writer: Bill Mantlo Artist: […]
Panel of the Day #87 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Now this is what we all like to see: Spidey not taking any mess from anybody! It’s funny, this was one of my first issues of Amazing Spider-Man and I’m not quite sure I remember […]
Panel of the Day #394 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Peter’s realization in this issue was probably a good enough answer at the time. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #150 Published: c. August, 1975? Cover Date: November, 1975 “Spider-Man… Or Spider-Clone?” Writer: Archie Goodwin Artist: Gil […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for…” Jun 21, 04:34- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: So what you’re saying is that Chasm should be able to get the Statue of Liberty to walk…” Jun 21, 04:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for whatever…” Jun 20, 23:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “By the way, the last time I thought of psycho-reactive goo was Ghostbusters II. “Mood slime.”” Jun 20, 19:56
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: Yeah, I know that Spencer was the one who came up with the idea of Norman’s sins being…” Jun 20, 18:11
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornacek — “Could he have excreted it onto himself and had the same effect that it had on Peter?” Oh…” Jun 20, 17:55
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Geiseric: I do like Peter having a contingency plan in case Norman ever turned evil again, but the gas that…” Jun 20, 15:47
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: I was wondering during TWB’s Powerpoint presentation who among that group didn’t know Spider-Man is Peter. Ms. Marvel…” Jun 20, 15:38
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Joshua Nelson: Yeah, at least the the resolution to the Sinful Spider-Man made sense, given how the sins were put…” Jun 20, 15:32
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “One of the more confusing things is why do they need a plan? Luke beating up Norman isn’t particularly hard.…” Jun 20, 13:56
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I’m glad to see that Gwen is feeling better.