I’m sure that I and all of you reading this could think of a few ways Peter could have tested this experimental concoction, but I guess sometimes impulsivity wins! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #100 Published: […]
Now that’s a hit. Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #147 Published: c. November, 1988? Cover Date: February, 1989 “When the Bugle Blows” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Sal Buscema Inker: Sal Buscema Letterer: Rick Parker Colorist: Bob […]
Even though she would eventually have a change of heart, I’m not sure if Felicia will ever escape the whole “Black Cat loves Spider-Man, not Peter Parker” thing. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@hornacek: He’s in the middle of transforming.
Just checked the db – the issue I described came out the previous year. So this panel is when he had powers. Not sure why he would want to portray himself as this hairless, wrinkled old man. Is he disguising himself as someone here?
This scene is from when he had powers. He changes into another face on the next page. So there’s no reason to think this is his real face.
Is this the Chameleon without his mask? If so I didn’t know that we’d ever seen his real face.
I remember when he got “powers” (The Thief Who Stole Himself issue in the Micheline run) – he went from just using masks to using technology so that he could holographically (or was it actually a physical transformation?) change himself instantly to anyone he wanted. I remember him saying that the process of applying this new technology to himself altered his body so that he no longer had his original face (or something like that).