Love it when everything works out.
Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #27
Published: c. November, 1978?
Cover Date: February, 1979
“The Blind Leading the Blind”
Writer: Bill Mantlo
Artist: Frank Miller
Inker: Frank Springer
Letterer: Denise Wohl
Colorist: Bob Sharen
Now this is awkward. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #188 Published: c. October, 1978? Cover Date: January, 1979 “The Jigsaw Is Up!” Writer: Marv Wolfman Artist: Keith Pollard Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: Jim Novak Colorist: Bob […]
Little did they know,”filling the whole city with Spider-Men” would actually become a possibility several decades later! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #50 Published: May, 1967? Cover Date: July, 1967 “Spider-Man No More!” Writer: Stan Lee […]
Ouch. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #153 Published: c. November, 1975? Cover Date: February, 1976 “The Longest Hundred Yards!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: John Costanza Colorist: Glynis Wein
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Thanks for the fun comments. What’s betty up to these days anyway?
Wait, in that first panel is Betty implying that when Ned proposed to her she jumped at the opportunity?
After Ned proposed, Betty spent many issues telling him that she had to talk to Peter (her ex-boyfriend) first before she could give him an answer. That is a giant red-flag there, guys.
Man: “Would you marry me?”
Woman: “Um, can I talk to my ex-boyfriend first before I give you an answer?”
Man: “Uh, why?”
Woman: “Oh, no reason.”
Man: “What could he possibly say that would change your answer to me?”
Woman: “Oh, look at the time! Gotta run!”
Then after Betty finally said “yes” to Ned, they didn’t get married until ~100 issues later. On the ASM Classics podcast Josh suggests that Betty kept extending the engagement and putting off the wedding date for so long because she kept hoping to get back together with Peter.
You can tell this is early Frank Miller because he’s drawing a scene with 2 women and he doesn’t draw them as prostitutes.