I’m just now realizing how terrifying riding that glider could be for some people.
Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #180
Published: c. July, 1991?
Cover Date: September, 1991
“The Child Within, Part 3: Shame”
Writer: J.M. DeMatteis
Artist: Sal Buscema
Inker: Sal Buscema
Letterer: Rick Parker
Colorist: Bob Sharen
I’m sure many of us would agree with Felicia. I would also add that the black suit definitely falls under the “three S’s”: Sleek, scary, and sexy! Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #99 […]
I’m sure Peter’s luck will turn around. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #5 Published: c. August, 1963? Cover Date: October, 1963 “Marked for Destruction by Dr. Doom!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko […]
Does Electro seriously think Spidey’s just going to stand still and allow himself to be shot? Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #9 Published: c. December, 1963? Cover Date: February, 1964 “The Man Called Electro!” Writer: Stan […]
on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I really love the dramatic angle and — well, everything — in this panel.
Really did love Harry’s stint as Green Goblin. Always felt like a little bit of a weasel especially with the way he faked Peter’s Parents which contrasts to Norman’s interpretation. Plus he was rather tragic with ghost of his father and tragically repeating him. And he was a villain who was actually Peter’s age which there really isn’t that many and not only that unlike Norman, Harry actually had a real relationship with Peter and really had reasons to hate him beyond even his father. I just wish more writers took advantage of him.