A reasonable request.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #99
Published: c. May, 1971?
Cover Date: August, 1971
“A Day in the Life Of –”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Artie Simek
Panel(s) of the Day #944
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1479 (Splash Page Sunday!)
I have a bad feeling about this. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #184 Published: c. June, 1978? Cover Date: September, 1978 “White Dragon! Red Death!” Writer: Marv Wolfman Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Frank Giacoia Letterer: John […]
Panel(s) of the Day #571
We haven’t seen this guy in a few years, so I’m thinking it’s about time for another comeback. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #24 Published: c. August, 1978? Cover Date: November, 1978 “Spider-Man […]
Panel of the Day #1537
It would be a simpler, more humble life for sure. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #61 Published: c. September, 1981? Cover Date: December, 1981 “By the Light of the Silvery Moonstone…!” Plot: Roger […]
3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: If that’s true then this book did a terrible job explaining it. They should assume that everyone reading ASM…” Jun 22, 19:20- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornaceck- In fairness, Peter and Kamala both worked together in X-Men 30-31. In X-Men 30, they both worked with Norman.…” Jun 22, 18:17
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Geiseric: Yeah, it feels like we’re doing backflips just to explain how Peter can be evil again. It would have…” Jun 22, 16:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “The funny thing is this feels like an extremely convoluted series of events to get Peter back to infected by…” Jun 21, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: Well, Jonah, Connors and Doug know her last name now. At the way TWB is freely calling her “Ms.…” Jun 21, 15:06
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Hornacek- no, Ms. Marvel’s identity is not publicly known.” Jun 21, 11:39
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Michael: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for…” Jun 21, 04:34
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “@Evan Berry: So what you’re saying is that Chasm should be able to get the Statue of Liberty to walk…” Jun 21, 04:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “I think that the reason why Norman is putting his businesses in Peter’s name is to frame Peter for whatever…” Jun 20, 23:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #52 (Legacy #946): “Goo Ex Machina!” or “How Can We ‘Rek’ This Story?”: “By the way, the last time I thought of psycho-reactive goo was Ghostbusters II. “Mood slime.”” Jun 20, 19:56
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
The comic came out the month I was born. I can’t say I am a fan of the Gil Kane art on this book.
Peter has crazy eyes here. I feel myself siding with JJJ… if your employee looks at you that way, time to call security to escort them out.
Peter’s explanation for why the situation may be dangerous is kind of funny considering that in the very next issue he takes a serum to get rid of his spider-powers.