Dang, Peter ain’t holding back.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #91
Published: c. October, 1970?
Cover Date: December, 1970
“To Smash the Spider!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel(s) of the Day #845
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1098
Just getting hit by the knuckles on those gauntlets looks like it would really hurt. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #46 Published: c. January, 1967? Cover Date: March, 1967 “The Sinister Shocker!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #134
A costume mix-up like that would be a tad awkward, that’s for sure! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #269 Published: c. July, 1985? Cover Date: October, 1985 “Burn, Spider, Burn!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz […]
Chi-Town’s Breakdown: The Amazing Mary Jane #4
Comics Crawlspace.com Leah Williams (Writer) Chi-Town Spidey (Review) Carlos Gomez (Artist) […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54
- on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I remember really enjoying this storyline, Spidey taking on a corrupt politician is really compelling. It’s a great example of the comic getting political without being obnoxious about it.
Uh-oh. Peter went straight for the Hitler analogy. That was old even in 1970.