Never forget about the spider-agility! Spider-Girl (Vol. 1) #21 Published: c. April, 2000? Cover Date: June, 2000 “Earthshaker!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Pat Olliffe Inker: Al Williamson Letterer: Jim Novak Colorist: Christie Scheele
Now I want pizza. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #252 Published: c. February, 1984? Cover Date: May, 1984 “Homecoming!” Plot: Roger Stern Script: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Brett Breeding Letterer: Joe Rosen Colorist: Glynis […]
Comics Crawlspace.com Leah Williams (Writer) Chi-Town Spidey (Review) Carlos Gomez (Artist) […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@hornacek – yup, me too. Reinforced by Peter’s response. MJ makes everything look good, even cookie pants.
I took MJ wearing sweats but saying “lingerie” as just MJ teasing Peter, not an error or CCA restriction. It’s just the kind of playful thing she would do to get Peter’s hopes up.
I remember reading this in the 90s when it originally came out. It’s a solid story taking place during the black costume era and it’s about some Russian guy who wants revenge on Peter’s parents for some reason even though they’re dead so he desecrates their graves iirc.
This scene with her sweats being described as “lingerie” was either (a) a miscommunication between the writer and artist, or (b) the Comic Code Authority thought the original panel was too sexy and made them redo it. Most likely (a), but (b) wouldn’t surprise me either.