I think we’re all dying a little inside after seeing that haircut. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #64 Published: c. July, 1968? Cover Date: September, 1968 “The Vulture’s Prey” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita and […]
Never doubt ol’ Spidey’s fortitude. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #5 Published: c. August, 1963? Cover Date: October, 1963 “Marked for Destruction by Dr. Doom!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Sam […]
Peter couldn’t get out of there fast enough! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #17 Published: c. August, 1964? Cover Date: October, 1964 “The Return of the Green Goblin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve […]
on PEPE LARRAZ, JOE KELLY AND JOHN ROMITA JR. BEGIN A NEW ERA OF AMAZING SPIDER-MAN!Auto Draft: “Am I the only one who is frustrated with all of the relaunches of ASM? This title should never, ever…” Dec 21, 14:15
on Spider-Previews 12-25-24: “Nice to see the guest writer addressing how silly and nonsensical all this matter in ASM is. LOL” Dec 21, 06:00
on 1994 Spider-Man #19-“Morbius” Review: “It’sn2 times, not 4 – original appearance and its original recap don’t count because they were in previous episodes, episodes…” Dec 20, 11:06
on ENTER THE SPIDER-NAUT!: “Yawn, oh hey another relaunch for for amazing spider man announced today where Peter is broke and looking for a…” Dec 19, 14:40
on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Thus spake Todd McFarlane. I have no doubt. [Insert “Old Man Yells at Cloud” meme.] (Incidentally, when trying…” Dec 18, 13:09
on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Evan Berry: (shakes fist at sky) BOB SHAREN!!!” Dec 18, 09:31 on Panel of the Day #1624 (Splash Page Sunday!): “What’s happening with Peter’s eyes here?” Dec 16, 12:12 on ENTER THE SPIDER-NAUT!: “Oh no! Things have never looked more bleak! I better buy this comic.” Dec 16, 12:03 on ENTER THE SPIDER-NAUT!: “While I love the Insomniac games, an unfortunate side effect seems to be Marvel creating a new suit for Spidey…” Dec 16, 04:29
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Reading moments like this really emphasises to me just how well her later-revealed backstory fits with what we saw from MJ prior, considering what happened to her mother, of course she’s going to have words of wisdom about this. A ret-con that’s actually well thought out and complements what came before?! How is that possible?! This kind of consistency really helps MJ feel more fleshed out than the standard comic book love interest.