That explanation will have to wait until another time. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #257 Published: c. July, 1984? Cover Date: October, 1984 “Beware the Claws of Puma!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe […]
That was easy. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #19 Published: c. October, 1964? Cover Date: December, 1964 “Spidey Strikes Back!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Sam Rosen
I think I understand. Black Cat (Vol. 1) #2 Published: July 10, 2019 Cover Date: September, 2019 “Holiest of Holies, Part 1” Writer: Jed MacKay Artist: Travel Foreman Inker: Travel Foreman Letterer: Ferran Delgado Colorist: […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@hornacek
I must’ve accidentally deleted it during the editing process. Thanks!
@William
It would be interesting if Conway had ideas for her backstory that were similar to what was eventually developed by Stern and DeFalco.
THE best series of panels in all comics
It’s amazing to think her backstory wasn’t planned at this point, her face on that first panel retroactively does a great job of conveying just how deep that remark cut. It’s always great when a retcon can actually enrich a moment from the past.
This post seems to be omitting the comic name and issue number.