Stephen Colbert recently did a bit about a Cambridge University study suggesting that Spider-Man’s wall-crawling powers can not exist in the real world. Elliot Hawkes, an engineer from Stanford disagrees, since he and his colleagues invented something that […]
This Thursday I’ll be recording an interview with writers Roger Stern and Tom DeFalco. The two are going to talk about working with Steve Ditko back in the 1980s. I’ll take questions for the two […]
Amazing Spider-Man #25 (Silver Sable :D) Monsters Unleashed #5 Spider-Man #14 (Spider/Gwen) Totally Awesome Hulk #17 (Silk) Uncanny Avengers Vol 3 #21 (Peter Parker/Spider-Man) Venom #5 (Peter Parker/Spider-Man) Previews provided by Comic Book Resources
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Bridged?
That would be a horrible cop-out. The clone thing is outplayed at this point. Fans were in an uproar about Peter possibly being a clone. Imagine the backlash (probably to a slightly lesser extent) if the Gwen who died was a clone.
Everything I’ve been told is wrong…. so does that mean that the entire run so far is nonexistent? My job just got so much easier!
I think I side with some comments I’ve read on forums in that what we “knew was wrong” is two things
1. That P.I’s post-SW success can be attributed to Ock boosting it’s networth (thus putting all the credit back into his hands and not Peters’)
2. That Gwen Stacy NEVER died, and that the one who had the kids with Norman and was bridged was a clone