Collectors #3 is coming and I need your letters!!! What’s a letters page without letters? Well, it’s not much of a letters page, is it? Send me your thoughts, praise, questions or snark and get it published in the the third Collectors collection! Time is short, so don’t wait! Send those letters to me at eddie@collectorscomic.com today!
Collectors for July 17th, 2016. See more at www.collectorscomic.com.
Collectors New Comic Wednesday! This year will mark the 100th birthday of Charles Schulz. I’m celebrating by sharing my favorite story about him. It’s wordy, but worth it.
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54 on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
It’s an remarkable paragraph for all the web viewers; they will take
benefit from it I am sure.
#5 I am sorry, I was considering it as a standard book. Collectors is worth every penny!
RE #4: keep in my that this is an annual and not a single issue sized book. Collectors #2 was an 80 page comic for $6.99. This new one will be 64 pages and will most likely be $5.99 and not $6.99.
$6.99 cover price!
I would rage as well.
Who on earth would have anything genuinely nasty to say about Collectors?!
Thank you, George. The theme for the third book is 1950s pre-code horror comics. I hope you’ll consider writing a letter for the book, good or bad. In fact, I’m still hoping for a genuinely nasty letter!
As a big EC Comics horror fan, I really liked this one, Eddie! 😎