The Spider-Panel reviews:
*Amazing Spider-Man # 7
*Amazing Spider-Man #8
[powerpress]
You can also subscribe to the show on itunes with this link.
Once you listen to the show please share your thoughts on this thread on our message board.
If you missed our other show this month, here is the link.
Podcast # 339-Ultimate Spider-Man Season 3 Cartoon Reviews
Podcast # 338- Spider-News
Podcast # 337- 2014 Spider-Jeopardy
Join the Crawlspace crew as they review the following books: If you would like to see the video of this recording click on this link and be sure to subscribe to our youtube channel.
In this podcast the Crawlspace crew review Dan Slott’s last issue on Amazing Spider-Man. His 10 year run ends with Amazing Spider-Man #801. The crew gives it a grade and lists the pros and cons. […]
The crew tackles the following books:*Amazing Spider-Man #832*Amazing Spider-Man #833*Amazing Spider-Man #834 This podcast was available two weeks earlier to patreon members who help support the show and podcast. Are you a member? Please join […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Since this (and other Spider-verse) comic-books are not selling bad at all, it make me wonder do people really enjoy reading adventures of their favourite characters no mater how out-of-character they may be?
I just don’t understand who the audience of this slasher story supposed to be.