Recent Comments

• Fra X on Arachnid Analysis: The Clone Saga is misunderstood: “SM 75 among the best? For me among the worst! Harras, what was wrong with you!?! The 400 was unfortunately…” Apr 20, 12:32
• Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I will never forgive Marvel for needlessly turning Sandman into a villain again. For no valid reason. Such a waste…” Apr 20, 09:09
• Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man episode #63-“Doom” Review: “It’s not “somehow” if it’s clearly said in the episode. Officially, no one besides X-Men are part of Spidey’s universe” Apr 19, 12:10
• Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1662: “This was the future – “street-meat” was a term that all the cool kids used.” Apr 19, 06:30
• Dark Mark on Panel(s) of the Day #1661 (Mary Jane Monday!): “Is that Mary Jane or a Furby? Cause that looks like a Furby.” Apr 17, 17:15
• Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man episode #62-“The Gauntlet of the Red Skull” Review: “Nothing wrong in damsel in distress if others get into distress too. But I also found it strange that she…” Apr 17, 14:59
• ERIC DAMON SMITH on Spider-Previews 03-08-23: “i remeber reading the comic book before” Apr 16, 17:33
• Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man episode # 61-“Arrival” Review: “Maybe there were official reality numbers or none given to 90s cartoon and they originally were intended to be one…” Apr 16, 09:31
• Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man Double Review-“The Return of Hydro-Man” parts 1 and 2: “Well, it was interesting twist. And there always will be critics, no matter what. I liked seeing Felicia back and…” Apr 15, 10:30
• jbeltramirez on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1 (Legacy #965): “Brander New Day/Bigger Time” or “Oh, I Thought They Were Giving Us Titles Again”: “maybe this link could work. https://www.chasingamazingblog.com/2013/09/06/could-this-man-really-be-the-hobgoblin/” Apr 14, 16:25