The reviews are coming across the “web” on Amazing Spider-Man 2. Here is a ranking of it against the other Spider-Man movies from Rotten Tomatoes.
Entertainment Weekly has a great breakdown of various critics.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Drew Goddard Comments On New Spider-Movie
You may remember that earlier this year that Drew Goddard was rumored to be the choice to direct the new Marvel produced Sony “threeboot” of Spidey. But that never came to pass. This is most […]
New Amazing Posters
Trends International a poster company got trigger happy and has released some images from the Amazing Spider-Man movie. This is the first good close up look at the Lizard we’ve had. There is also a […]
Daley & Goldstein Talk Spidey, Civil War Cameo, Confirm No Origin
Spider-movie reboot writers John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein spoke with Vulture recently to promote their new movie, the National Lampoon’s Vacation reboot. During their conversation, they dropped a wee bit of Spidey info – […]
14 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55
ac on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “That sounds vaguely familiar. That happened after the clone saga right? I quit the comics for a while after the…” Apr 29, 07:17
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@AC – The explanation in the comics was that the Wizard (Sandman’s former team member) was disgusted by his turn…” Apr 29, 06:54
AC on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I couldn’t agree more about the Sandman. I didn’t care about this character either UNTIL he turned good, I even…” Apr 28, 20:35
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “As someone who read this in the realtime, I enjoyed Sandman’s evolution from villain to non-villain to Sable employee to…” Apr 27, 09:31
Dark Mark on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “Ok, ok – I’ll wear my glasses next time I respond…” Apr 27, 09:21
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t know who anything about this Laden so I have no opinion on their art.” Apr 27, 09:19
Dark Mark on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t care one what of the other about Sandman. I just really hate Laden’s art. Always have.” Apr 26, 21:32
Fra X on Arachnid Analysis: Reflections of a Jackal: “I wonder why Professor Warren has aged so suddenly!” Apr 26, 04:34
Dark Mark on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #2/966: “Ryan, I think I figured of what bothers me with this run so far – we are getting Peter, Which…” Apr 24, 21:01
SM3 > ASM2 ??……
That’s 10 kinds of wrong.
@11 – Yeah, Spider-Man 3 was pretty popular fans of the Raimi trilogy. I remember when I saw it in the cinema the rest of the audience was loving it, they clapped at the end and everything.
Crazy!??!
ASM2
ASM
SM2
SM
SM3
Eh, this was way better than the first movie. Not sure why it’s getting lower than that one. Also, more people like Spider-Man 3 than the internet realizes, so the rankings don’t surprise me.
Yeah, there’s no possible way it should be lower than Spider-Man 3.
I liked this one quite a lot. It easily ranks right up there with the Raimi films…just as good as Spider-Man 2, IMO.
1) Spider-Man 2 (2004)
2)Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
3) Spider-Man (2002)
4) Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
5) Spider-Man 3 (2007)
The Tomatometer scale here is not really comparable. Half the ASM2 reviews compare it with SM2 and come up rotten only because of the comparison. I would probably rank SM2 at the top as well (the first half hour is fantastic!), but 10 years from now I’d rather rewatch the ASMs simply because they are more fun (and the visual effects in ASM2 was … Amazing). Also, SM2 was far from perfect overall. Gwen Stacy has ten times the character that MJ had, and not because of the acting but the screenplays.
It feels like nowadays people have become much more critical. I cannot imagine SM2 getting 94% on Rotten Tomatoes today.
I don’t have a ranking. But I think I it’s a toss up between ASM1 or SM2 for which movies I enjoy the most. Those two are basically what I’d call perfect film adaptations of Spider-Man. Though they both have problems obviously.
The Raimi films were plagued with horrible casting choices and had near unbearable levels of camp humour at times, but the first two had very nice focused plots that were very reminiscent of Stan Lee’s original run.
Ironically the Webb movies have spot on casting (nearly every role has been cast well imo), but the script for ASM2 is a complete mess and focuses too much on needless fan service (Felicia Hardy’s role was a waste). Good scenes were cut from the theatrical version of ASM1, most notably scenes that focused on Connors human side and made him a more balanced character.
I LOVED SM 2 when it first came out, but that faded on repeated viewings. The constant Parker Luck was overdone and there is no way a powerless Peter would just turn the other way when someone was assaulted. This is a guy who fought the Scorpion without powers!
Did…..Did I watch the same movie as everyone else?! SM3 has a higher rating than ASM2?!?!
Having SM2 on the bottom of your list is pure lunacy!
I think ASM 2 has more problems than any previous movie. But is also gets some things right that nonedof the others have.
My list would be –
SM2
SM1
ASM2
SM3
ASM1
For me it would be
ASM 2
ASM 1
SM 1
SM 3
SM 2
so what do I know?
@#1 Not if it makes money.
Dang. Thought the film would get middling reviews, similar to Spider-Man 3 and probably end up ranking a little bit higher. Did not expect the percentage to be that low. The film will still make a ton of money but I wonder if this affects Sony’s plans for the future of the franchise?