Erik Larsen just posted a before and after cover of Amazing Spider-Man #35 on the Jack Kirby Fan page.
Steve Ditko drew the cover on the left which was published in Italy. His editor Stan Lee evidently didn’t like that version and had Jack Kirby re-draw Spidey and place it on Ditko’s background. Ditko left three issues later? Could this be the final straw that made Ditko walk out?
You might be interested in …
Maximum Carnage Mini Muggs
Visitors to the New York Comic Con will have a chance to buy these awesome Mini Muggs. USA Today is reporting that Hasbro will spotlight the infamous Maximum Carnage story line from 1993. If you […]
Previews: January 23rd, 2019
Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man #2Superior Spider-Man #2 Previews Provided By Adventures In Poor Taste & AV Club Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man #2 STORY BY: Tom TaylorART BY: Juann CabalCOVER BY: Andrew Robinson, Bryan Hitch Spider-Man is the worst […]
Israeli ‘Spider-Man’ Attacks Commuters
In a news article dated February 15, 2009: “Man dressed as comic superhero jumps on cars, lassos them with ‘web’ of rope in Rosh Ha’ayin: Israeli drivers in Rosh Ha’ayin were met with an unusual […]
7 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I agree about the web pits. They’re in the wrong place. It doesn’t look bad, but it is clearly wrong.
Looks to like Stan The Man got it right!
I like Steve Ditko’s version (left) because it showas clearly how spidey’s signal is straight and that he is hanging by 2 hands, very spidery like hehehe…waiting for it’s prey to come…
Is it just me or are the web pits on the left image in the wrong place, i.e. in the elbow crack, not the pits?
@2 – Be careful or that will be someone’s message board question in the next podcast.
Yeah I prefer the image on the right too. Has Spidey’s ass ever been that prominent on a cover? LOL
I guess Stan didn’t want’s Spidey’s ass to be the first thing the reader saw when they picked up the book.