I review the opening to “No Escape” as Allister Smythe is set for execution and how he intends to escape with the help of the villains that Dr. Octopus has maimed since Amazing Spider-Man #700. Great work here by the creative team.
ryan3178
View articlesBusiness and Technology Teacher, blogger and long time comic book collector.
You might be interested in …
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-man #70 Review
by ryan3178
I review the Sinister War Prelude with Amazing Spider-Man #70/871. Picking up where the Chameleon Conspiracy ended. This issue is very engaging and sets up everything for Nick Spencer’s final story line in Amazing Spider-Man. […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #42, Symbiote #4 and Amazing Mary Jane #6 Reviews
by ryan3178
Even though I am in Shelter in Place, I review the latest Spider-Man books. Giving all of them a B range grade, I find the main Spider-Man books a bit more high quality compared to […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #59 Review
by ryan3178
I review Amazing Spider-Man #59/953 as the big final battle between Spider-man and Tombstone for the life of Janice Lincoln. John Romita Jr and Scott Hanna rock the artwork and add a great level of […]
7 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
I’m very much okay with the stated Marvel attitude on smaller continuity details: it’s a nice icing on the cake, but our main focus is on getting the broad strokes right and focusing on making the story and art good for that specific issue. And I’m fine with that – I think it’s more important that it succeeds as a story.
(Especially since questions like “Can Smythe take off his helmet?” and “Is there a death penalty in Marvel’s NYC?” are things that can be kinda intuited from the comic itself. Obviously they’d have taken off his helmet if they could, it’s not as if the other supervillains are keeping their costumes, and obviously the death penalty is legal since it’s happening in this story. And by the time we reach the issue of who runs the Raft, I think we have reached a level of continuity detail which doesn’t matter either way.)
Sigh… maybe the New York State in the Marvel Universe still has the Death Penalty… I mean, we’re reading books about a man who can crawl on the walls… is this worthy of getting bent about?
My only negative comment about the review is that the issue’s # was incorrectly stated as issue #10 when it was in fact issue #11.
That’s why I brought them up in my review here K-Box. There is a lot of logic that doesn’t really work here. Now say it was mentioned that despite the original plan, the Raft has become a failure and the new S.H.I.E.L.D. has decided to close down operations and give it back to the state of New York. Then the mayor or governor could do that no problem. Even bring up the talk over in the current Secret Avengers title how they are using both Seagate and another new prison for super powered criminals since the failure of 42, the Cage and the Cube. However, it’s not even brought up just like Jameson lands twice on the Raft when he was already there. Holes right there that keep it from being a more higher grade story even if it was pretty good.
Xingken: If that’s the case, then it needs to be explicitly established on the printed page.
The funny thing is, there are actually any number of very good reasons a) why New York State would have a death penalty in the Marvel Universe and b) why the Raft could get shut down, but Slott doesn’t bother to supply any of them, because not only does he not even bother to include a single line about how, say, the wake of Civil War caused the New York State Supreme Court to reconsider its earlier death penalty ruling, but no matter how incompetent the Raft has been, Jonah has no power over it.
After all, I actually saw Slott suggesting in his CBR interview that the Raft is not legally part of New York State … in which case, the mere MAYOR of New York CITY would have even LESS jurisdiction over it.
Of course, this is all moot anyway, since according to Marvel’s own official website, the Raft is S.H.I.E.L.D. property, which means that NEITHER the mayor NOR even the governor of New York has any ability to get it shut down, but hey, why should professional writers be bothered to keep the continuity straight of something that’s only existed since 2005?
http://marvel.com/universe/Raft
#2
Well, our New York doesn’t host 80% of the world’s supervillains, who might have caused the state Supreme Court in Marvel universe to reconsider that decision at some point.
Loved the “omg i’m reformed” and “pfft no such thing as refo… erm…” exchange. Made me laugh so hard 😀
I’m incredibly annoyed by this back-and-forth Goblin teasing. An arc happens, no sight -> Goblin shows up for a second -> another arc happens, no sight. Will it drag forever until the series will abruptly end due to usual editorial kaboom?
And as has been pointed out by others, the death penalty doesn’t exist in New York, because it was ruled unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court, but then, why should I expect the man who wrote extensively about the law in She-Hulk to actually do his homework on that score in this story?
And as has already been asked:
Smythe was allowed to keep his Spider-Slayer helmet in prison … why?
That’s like a hostage situation taking place in a crime drama about a prison in a non-superhero universe because the guards let a prisoner keep a loaded gun.