I review Superior Spider-Man #9 from the far reaches of my mind. What did I think abut this new controversial issue in the life of Spider-Man? Find out.
You might be interested in …
The Superior Spider-Man #15 Review
IN THIS ISSUE! –Carlie and Yuri Watanabe return to investigate Ock’s crimes/heroic actions –Mary Jane and Aunt May begin to get suspicious of “Peter’s” behavior – Spider-Pus hones in on the Hobgoblin and enacts a […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-man #29 Review
I review Amazing Spider-Man #29/923, part 3 of the Dr. Octopus story. I have to admit this feels like a normal issue of Spider-Man. The character work between Norman and Otto and Peter and […]
Read’s Reads Sinister War #2 Review
I review the second issue of Sinister War, which is also apparently part 3 of Nick Spencer’s final Spider-Man story. The issue does a great job to filling in some of the gaps that happened […]
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Weblines: THE J. MICHAEL STRACZYSNKI RUN – Part XV.: “Good to see you back! I’m quite busy right now, so I don’t know when I get to read the…” Nov 24, 06:33- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I hope to have a lot of fun with the upcoming Spider-Man revenge squad story coming up in issue 12.
I dug it… and kudos for the video review… it’s the first one I watch… loved it… both the vid & the book. 🙂
Ha,Ha. Very creative. Thanks for all the effort you put into these videos.
Yeah, I’m processing but that still. Why I bit my lip before I gave final grade.
Not gonna go into detail about that one little thing? You know… the potential “sacrifice?” And how totally out of character that was?