I review Superior Spider-Man #8. The issue triumphs with the character moments, but loses it with the Avengers letting Otto off the hook a little too easily.
You might be interested in …
Read’s Reads Ultimate Spider-Man #2 Review
I review issue 2 of the new hit series, Ultimate Spider-Man by Jonathan Hickman and Marco Checchetto. While the issue continues world building, there is just something fun and engaging about this Peter Parker as […]
Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #34/928 Review
I review issue #34/928 of Amazing Spider-Man. While the first part of the “sinister” Spider-man was ok. This issue is a major turn around, focusing on villains and the darkness of the Spider-Man Who Laughs. […]
Superior Spider-Man #26 Review (Stillanerd’s Take)
The solicitation for this issue states that “the thing that happened at the end of [Superior Spider-Man] #25” which “raised all those questions” would be answered. If this was supposed to be referring to the […]
3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I don’t even understand how I finished up right here, but I thought this post used to be great. I do not realize who you’re but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger should you aren’t already.
Cheers!
Am I the only one who thinks that Otto’s brain waves shouldn’t be the same as Peters?
Good job getting this review out first 🙂 Sounds like dissapointing follow up to issue 7 though.