Highlights of the show:
*The Spider-Panel reviews Amazing Spider-Man # 697-699
* Big Time writer Dan Slott debates Chapter One John Byrne over a controversial Aunt May panel.
*Don and Chris do a dramatic reading of the fight which is hilarious.
[powerpress]
Here is a link to our xml feed and you can subscribe to it here.
You can also subscribe to the show on itunes with this link.
Once you listen to the show please review it on this thread on our message board.
Highlights of the episode includes: *Reading of Itunes reviews. *Our favorite Spider-Man cliffhanger of all time. *JR debates who’s a better villain Khan or Norman Osborn. *George shares a hilarious Sesame Street story. *We share what should in […]
Pop in your blu-ray or DVD and listen to the cast record an audio commentary of the Amazing Spider-Man 2 movie. This podcast is available only to patreon members. The recording of this episode was […]
Highlights of this episode include: *Our monthly recommendations * Message board Q and A *Some of the best include: What Spidey character would be great in a sitcom? *Would Ben Reilly approve of Kaine taking his […]
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53 on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Don’s Canadian accent was terrible. He’s no Dan Aykroyd.
It wasn’t meant to be an impression, really, just myself acting out the tone that I read into Slott’s posts that EMPHASIZED certain words SUDDENLY and made him seem like he was REALLY INTO WHAT HE WAS SAYING. I don’t know why it came out sounding like a stoned surfer dude. Dan Slott sounds nothing like that.
that dan slott impersonation sound like a weird mix between phillip J fry and bobcat goldthwait
@#9
Guess somebody has to…
@4: Yep, and while everyone hate her and I still like her
Marvel’s editors need a “bete noir” to pretend to be wittingly noble against, even when the site isn’t noir.
@#6
You think they care? We’re not even banning people for spoiling a book, and they’ll still consider us the more evil site. Watch.
P.S. This podcast decisively refutes the claim that this web-site is “All Hate For Current Spider-Man Creators All the Time”.
I wonder if Slott’s going to have Spider-Ock liquidate a bunch of C and D-level bad guys (like Massacre) for a while.
@#3
You’re anticipating it for that? And you think it’s interesting? who else’s identity is she going to “deduce,” and why is she suddenly the only person smart enough to do that? But anyway, I was talking more of something else. I guess we’ll see how things go down.
I’m agreeing with you Enigma
Carlie makes a return in SSM3? That’s interesting, I think I’ll read the issue just for that
Oh god. I can’t wait until the next podcast after Dec. 26th.
“So you’re not into the book because the character is so out of character?”
Exactly. That’s it in a nutshell.