Stan Lee Media is suing Disney for 5.5. billion dollars in damages over the rights to Marvel Comics characters. Digital Spy.com reports that Lee originally signed over the rights to the characters he co-created back in 1998, but that Lee’s company SLM claims that an amended version of the contract was signed and is now seeking damages. In a weird twist of legal confusion, Stan Lee is not involved with the company at all. Yeah, it’s confusing. More on this report following the link above.
Donovan Grant
View articlesTypical college aged comic fan who wants to write and draw in the biz
You might be interested in …
Spider-Previews 06/16/21
by Brad Douglas
Marvel sent over previews for Spider-related comics coming out on June 16, 2021. Will you be picking up any of these? Discuss it in the comment section.
Shameik Moore cast as Mile Morales in Animated Spider-Man Movie
by Brad Douglas
Actor Shameik Moore has been cast as the voice of Miles Morales in the upcoming animated Spider-Man movie. Moore is 21 years old. In addition to being an actor he’s also a rapper. He has […]
Spider-Variants of the Week 11/30/22
by Mohammed
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Peter Parker & Miles Morales: Spider-Men Double Trouble #1 PETER PARKER & […]
18 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1609 (Splash Page Sunday!): “Who knew Peter had a skirt in his closet made out of webbing?” Nov 4, 07:43
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1608 (Ditko!): “That brick wall doesn’t stand a chance.” Nov 4, 07:41
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1608 (Ditko!): “Peter is so upset that he forgot his own hyphen. Twice! And he also referred to himself as “The” Spiderman.” Nov 4, 04:28
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Joshua Nelson: At this point I don’t expect Marvel to have Peter tell Aunt May that he’s Spider-Man. If they…” Nov 3, 00:40
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Kenneth: I wasn’t even thinking about her health but you’re right. But just from the years of May making wheatcakes…” Nov 3, 00:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Dark Mark: Yeah, this issue really felt like an epilogue and not the final issue of a story. One issue…” Nov 3, 00:35
- Joshua Nelson on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “Well…it’s over. Like most, I have not liked this run. At all. There are plenty of things I can critique…” Nov 2, 18:13
- Kenneth on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “Would anyone who had both heart attacks and cancer eat pizza? Especially at the age Aunt May is? Then again…” Nov 2, 06:24
- Dark Mark on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “Once again, the review is better than the issue. I thought the final arc, as a whole, was not a…” Nov 1, 20:21
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Michael: I’m guessing that Tombstone bribed the judge *after* his plan to kill Janice failed? Because otherwise it makes no…” Oct 31, 19:32
This story is on Reuters.com and many other reputable sites. According to Reuters, Walt Disney’s statement: “This lawsuit is without merit. It arises out of the same core facts and legal claims that have been rejected by three federal district court judges.”
I would agree that based upon other intellectual property claims in comics, that “Stan Lee Media” does not stand a chance…
@Boomstick-Other news outlets, like the LA Times and the Times Live have reported this so it’s looking like it’s true.
Stan very likely would have signed a straightforward contract signing over all creative rights to his employer. That was (and is) standard practice, though there may (or may not be) grey areas.
That said, it pays to remember that DigitalSpy is a gossip site. Much as many of us dislike Disney/Marvel’s corporate culture and prevailing atitudes, it’s smarter to wait until more definitive facts are in.
Stan never owned any of these characters, and surely he had the brains to know that. It’s one thing to let fans lionize him as if he was the sole creator of Spider-Man, which was unprincipled but not illegal. But he’s not stupid; he has known his entire professional life that Marvel Inc. owns all of these characters. I don’t believe Stan ever signed anything over to anyone.
“The question remains, are they using/acting in Stan Lee’s name?”
No. Not one bit. It’s sad that people will assume stan is behind this because of the company’s name.
“if they are not acting in his behest, how can they presume to be acting in his interest regarding his creations?”
They are claiming that Stan signed over all of his ownership to any marvel characters he created and that they now own them. Even if Stan signed his ownership over, it means nothing because he had no ownership to sign over. Stan Lee Media are acting on their own behalf to scam anything they can get that doesn’t belong to them.
I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Marvel/Disney. Marvel, not too long ago, had an infringement lawsuit they brought up in court dismissed because they (Marvel) were caught fabricating evideence. That said, if-IF-SLM is indeed acting without Stan’s permission, I don’t root for them eihter.
The question remains, are they using/acting in Stan Lee’s name? (a trademark he DOES own) and, if they are not acting in his behest, how can they presume to be acting in his interest regarding his creations?
This is probably going to be a prolonged, tangled legal mess, with neither side coming out smelling like roses.
@#10
… then I hope Marvel/Disney rapes them over a barrel!
A disturbing development, this. What puzzles me is how SLM can hope to sue for copyright if Stan himself is signator on whatever agreement is in question. And #8 has raised a good question about why SLM retains Stanb’s name. Has Stan himself issued any statement?
STAN HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS! Stan Lee Media is the company that was run by con man Peter Paul and suckered poor Stan and others to invest in the company. Stan has long since severed all ties with the company and has even been involved in lawsuits against them. Despite this, they still have legal right to the name Stan Lee Media. Since going bankrupt, the company has brought up crazy lawsuits for outrageous amounts over and over again. It’s all a huge scam and Stan has enough class to have nothing to do with.
When I hung out in Stan’s office with the producers of his documentary (finally coming out on DVD), this subject came up and Stan express such shame and remorse for having been taken in by Peter Paul. He said he seemed so genuine and so connected to everyone and everything. He even arranged for Stan to meet then president Bush and receive a special lifetime achievement award from him. As soon as the company began to crumble and the shady deals started to show, Stan got the hell out and cut all connections. He’s been running his own company POW ever since.
Stan is not involved. Why would he get a cut?
why is it still called stan lee media when the man himself isnt involved anymore? 🙂 And if they win(however unlikely) Stan should get a huge cut out of it.
Really? Wow, that’s a new one on me.
Stan Lee is not even involved in the suit. SLM is his old company that tried to even sue him at one time. I hope this suit gets thrown out.
after what I’ve learned about the relationship between Stan Lee and Steve Ditko, I’m not sure how to feel about this…
I admire chutzpah. Stan-however peripherally he is involved almost certainly doesn’t have much of a chance of actually this, but you have to admire him. My feeling is that this is probably more geared towards “the principle of the thing” than actually winning the five billion.
I mean look at the prolonged legal war going on over the rights to Superman.
Still, good to see Stan’s indomitable spirit is undimmed.
From what I hear, Stan isn’t actually involved with this company. He’s with POW now.
Actually, it important to note that Stan Lee has nothing to do with this as he left this company in the late 2000’s
Go, Stan the man!