AMAZING SPIDER-MAN ANNUAL #38 Review

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN ANNUAL #38

“Identity Wars, Part 1”

Writer: John Layman

Penciler: Lee Garbett

Inker: Mark Pennington

Colorist: Fabio D’Auria

Cover Art: Steve McNiven, Mark Morales, and Marte Garcia

Be warned – there are SPOILERS ahead!

Spider-Man annuals have always been a downer.

Some of the character’s greatest, most influential stories occurred in annuals, such as the first Sinister Six story in The Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1, the story of his parents in The Amazing Spider-Man King-Size Special #5, and his wedding to Mary Jane in The Amazing Spider-Man Annual #21 (a story that Quesada can never take away from us, True Believers).  On the other hand, the vast majority of Spider-Man annuals – the ones that aren’t simply reprints, of course – range from mediocre to utter crap.

This is one from the “utter crap” category.

The Plot

Spider-Man, Deadpool, and Bruce Banner are transported to a parallel universe in which Spider-Man is a Batman-esque hero that has all but eliminated crime from New York City.  “Hijinx” ensue.

The Good

Despite being the first part of a trilogy of annuals, this issue does a decent job of presenting a story that is relatively self-contained.  Deadpool and Banner (with an appearance as the Hulk mixed in) feature primarily in the setup, but they more or less disappear once Layman gets into the meat of Spidey’s adventure. The primary focus of the issue is a Spider-Man story, and that story has a beginning, a middle, and an end.  Yes, the epilogue of the issue fails to resolve the primary conflict of being trapped in an alternate universe, but without those last two pages setting up the Deadpool and Hulk annuals the story does stand up on its own.

The artwork of Lee Garbett, while painfully bland at times (mostly the overly-expository dialogue sequences), is still good enough to put in the plus column.  This is the first work of his that I’ve seen, and after hearing our very own Stella talk him up on her great Batgirl to Oracle: A Barbara Gordon Podcast, I was expecting to be bowled over.  For the most part, I liked what I saw here.  The action sequences were clear and easy-to-follow, and the choice of shots were interesting enough to keep me reading.  I’m looking forward to seeing more of his work in the Spider-Man backup stories he’s currently drawing.

The Bad

Unfortunately, the story itself is not impressive.

Do you remember What If?  It was a comic series that is mostly remembered for two volumes that ran for 47 issues from 1977 to 1984 and for another 114 issues from 1989 to 1998.  It was a very mixed bag, with some pretty interesting premises and a whole lot of crappy ones.  And sometimes, there were ones that left horrifying mental scars, like What If Vol. 2 #34:

Generally, What If stories took a character and an event in that character’s career and then presented an alternate take on that event and its aftermath.  Volume 2 featured such stories as “What If Kraven the Hunter Had Killed Spider-Man?” (issue 17), “What If Spider-Man Had Kept His Six Arms?” (issue 42), and the Quesada-tastic “What If Spider-Man Had Not Married Mary Jane?” (issue 20).  It was common fodder for the series to present alternate takes on Spider-Man’s origin, especially Volume 1: What If #7 presented a story in which characters like Flash Thompson and Betty Brant (boy, Bertone would have a field day with this …) gain spider-powers instead of Peter, What If #19 imagines Spider-Man’s life if he had stayed in showbusiness instead of becoming a superhero, and What If #46 imagined what would happen if Uncle Ben had lived.

I mention all of these, and ESPECIALLY that last one, because this issue reminded me of What If.  It felt like it was an unused stock issue from the end of Volume 2 or something, because it was both unimaginative and by-the-numbers.  While reading, I could feel the “twists” coming pages ahead of time because it felt like something I had read before – and chances are, I probably have.  Don’t get me wrong – it’s certainly not the worst What If that I’ve read, but it’s so terribly generic that it failed to hold my interest for long.  I needed three different sittings to read this through once because it was simply so boring and obvious.

Despite the vanilla nature of the story, there were a few huge missed opportunities.  Despite being mentioned several times, we see absolutely nothing of the Peter-Gwen-Mary Jane love triangle that Layman sets up in the story.  In fact, Gwen only appears one page, and Mary Jane doesn’t appear at all.  The epilogue outright TELLS us that Peter has no interest in facing these alternate versions of Gwen and MJ, so the encounter never happens.  To quote Ben Grimm, watta revoltin’ development dis is!  Similarly, we see that the Aunt May of this universe is either appalled by the ongoing plan, terrified of Ben, or both, but the story never follows up on it.

Beyond that, I don’t really have much to say about the issue.  It was such a textbook alternate universe story that I can’t even find the words to discuss most of it.  It’s THAT bland.

The Ugly

Deadpool.

Okay, I get it.  There are people out there that like the character.  I’m not one of them.  In fact, I find the character so incredibly annoying that just seeing him makes my blood boil.  I’m tired of seeing the character shoehorned into Spider-Man stories.  Just make it stop.

The Bottom Line

ZZZZZ.  1 out of 5 webheads.

 

Like it? Share it!
Previous Article

Amazing Spider-Man Classics Podcast # 30 With 100% More BD and MJ

Next Article

CARNAGE #4 Review

You might be interested in …

13 Comments

  1. I wish the Annuals had a little more oomph to them rather than just being stories that feel like they could be a series of back-ups in the main book , but I still enjoyed this issue.

    As a sort of What If I thought it was tons better than both that last Kraven story we got (hated that thing) and the previous What If Uncle Ben Had Lived/Aunt May Had Died issues (not terrible but kinda dull). I wouldn’t mind seeing more of The Amazing Spider at some point. Maybe the beginning of his career when he’s just started to lure in and absorb the alternate Spider-Men.

  2. Oh, and I believe it was called The Vibranium Vendetta. Can’t believe I recall that.

  3. Now that I think about it, you’re right. Most Annuals haven’t been very good. The only one I recall enjoying was the wedding one.

  4. @Two-Bit Specialist and hermann22: For sure. I actually like a lot of What Ifs — though I’m too young to have read the first volume when it was coming out, so most of my experience is with the second volume. The problem with this story is that it was the laziest What If-type story possible, and one based on a concept that has been done to death (the old “What If Spidey’s Origin Was Slightly Different?” theme).

    @CrazyChris: I’ve never read anything written by Layman, and this story sure hasn’t inspired me to go out and find more of his work.

    @hornacek: There was also a string of annuals (I want to say 6-10) composed solely of reprints. That’s hardly “must read” material. 😉

  5. What do you mean, the majority of annuals range from mediocre to utter crap? What about the one that introduced Annex? Or last year’s (?) that introduced Jackpot. Umm, never mind.

    Seriously, there have been other great Spidey annuals – Jonah’s wedding (The Scorpion takes a bride), #13 and #15 with Doc Ock (art by Byrne and Miller respectively), #14 with Doc Strange (another Miller art). But yeah, most of them suck. My biggest complaint is that they don’t matter – most of them don’t fit into the normal continuity and could almost be a “untold tale”. The only exception I can think of is Mackie’s last issue where it continued the story from Amazing where Spidey had just rescued MJ and he spends the entire issue pressuring her into sex – it’s not a great story (spoiler alert – it’s terrible) but at least if you don’t read the annual you’ve missed out on the main storyline when you read the next regular issue.

    The rest of the annuals seem to be multi-part stories with either the other Spidey comics (which isn’t a bad idea if you’re gonna do a multi-part story in annuals) or with other comics – Atlantis Attacks, something about Vibranium, and this one – a shamless ploy to get you to buy other comics’ annuals that you wouldn’t normally buy.

  6. Sorry to hear this issue isn’t very good. I just finished the third volume of John Layman’s Chew series from Image, and that book never fails to be outstanding.

  7. I rather enjoy What If’s, even if they “don’t have ramifications in continuity.” If it’s a good story, who cares?

    You guys should read J.R.’s essay on What If Spidey issues. Some good stuff there. What If #46 is pretty good, I hear.

  8. I just can’t invest ANY interest in a What If story… A one shot that has no ramifications on continuity whatsoever. So why care about them?

    1 out of 5? Yeah, I’m just gonna go sit over here. I know how these tend to end up…

  9. Although I wish Layman had done more with the script, I did rather enjoy that he let the obvious stuff fall in the background… Something Slott is rather incapable of doing and it irks me.
    And if he had included evil Gwen/MJ, it would of been repetition. Who knows, maybe they’ll explore it in the other issues (doubtful).

  10. I liked the issue but I agree with you on one point. Theres no way hes not going to go at least visit Gwen once. “Oh Im sure shes evil so I wont bother” response kinda bothered me. Besides that, I thought it was pretty solid

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *