Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Variants of the Week 10/27/21
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Amazing Spider-Man #77/878 PREVIEWS Spider-Woman #16Black Widow #12 AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #77 STORY […]
What is the 4th Dimension?
We got a sneek peek of the fourth diminsion in the Spider-Man Shattered Diminsion game. So who is this in the picture? Is it a symbiote? Is it a zombie universe? What do you think? […]
Goldstein & Daley Confirmed For Spidey
Eleven days ago Stillanerd posted about a Deadline article saying that Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley (writers of the upcoming Vacation reboot) had been hired on as the writers for the Spider-Man reboot. Back […]
22 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
- Gevorg on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28
- Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “@Hornacek — I would make a horrible Spider-man. So many times, were I in his place, I would have confided…” Nov 5, 07:53
- Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1610 (Mary Jane Monday!): “At least he said “I have to go take photos for the Bugle.” This is a valid excuse since this…” Nov 5, 04:26
Do You Fear…LOSING MORE B-LIST AND SECONDARY CHARACTERS IN OVER THE TOP DEATHS AND BRUTALITY IN A SHITTY ASS CROSSOVER EVENT!?
a creepy mary sue like carlie named after Q’s daughter? she’ll probably be the only one with the key to victory.
If people do die in this event, maybe we’ll be lucky, and Carlie Cooper will be one of them.
Another event? Gee, what a surprise… 😛
@Berryman – Chill, man. It’s all good. No need to go all into debate-mode with me. 🙂
16
Mr Quesada was speaking, like so many of us do, without thinking about everything he was saying. It probably hasn’t even crossed his mind that all he does, is reminding fans about what they’ve done, and why.
Did he really say, “what makes Spider-Man so relatable is that he goes through all of the same things many of us do whether it’s going to school, losing his girlfriend, his marriage…” ?
What exactly did he mean by that? I don’t actually mean to be snarky – I’m honestly confused.
I do agree that what makes Spidey relatable is that he goes through many of the things we do – but has the added stress of being a superhero. ‘Losing’ the marriage simply does not fit on this list.
We all had to go to school. Pete had all of those stresses but also had to juggle his secret identity.
Probably all of us have had to endure the end of romantic relationships. Pete didn’t just lose his girlfriend but feels personally responsible for her death (and has no one he can talk to about it). Again, he endures an increased pressure and suffering of what we all felt – but we can still relate because it is our pain blown up to superhuman proportions.
But the marriage? I’m still happily married, but that doesn’t stop me from feeling for those people I know who have had a marriage end. But Pete and MJ’s marriage didn’t end – it retroactively never was. How can any of us possible relate to that?
In point of fact, this is exactly why I find the current incarnation so UNrelatable.
Pete had a marriage ‘end’ but never had to go through a divorce or any of the myriad of stresses that come along with it. Instead of having Peter deal with super-sized versions of issues that many of us face – he completely avoided any ramifications of the end of his marriage through a magical rewriting of history. How exactly does this make him relatable?
Was Mr. Quesada perhaps trying to be funny? Intentionally pointing out how incongruous this statement was?
I really don’t get it.
Im looking forward to this as a Fraction fan, i mean i really like Bendis but he is on burnout right now. But we dont need another event ,dont get me wrong im interested in it with the premise to an extent, but we just need a few years with no events so everything can have nice progress on their own. I mean techinly Shadowland and Fall of the Hulks were events. We just need a break.
Plus at a time when people are struggling to afford comics as is, its not going to be helped though having to by the actualy event title, despite what Breevort just saying you can by the main title and fully understand, if thats the case then that in its self there is no need to have tie ins.
And extinition event? Even if people die aint going to matter anyways since they will all be back.
“Really? Do we have to do this? We can’t just talk about our favorite character without bringing THAT up all the time?”
‘WE’ don’t, no. But dislike it though you may others are apt to bring up the deal with the devil now and then. Just because it’s not a big thing for you or because you hate hearing it doesn’t mean others can no longer talk about it, joking or otherwise.
“I mean, can’t we just talk about FUN stuff for once? Or is this all that’s left?”
You can talk about whatever you’d like. The rest of us will do the same.
@Berryman and Berserkfury
“As long as the retcon remains in place, we are going to keep bringing it up.”
Really? Do we have to do this? We can’t just talk about our favorite character without bringing THAT up all the time?
I mean, can’t we just talk about FUN stuff for once? Or is this all that’s left?
In the beginning, Quesada was talking about the economy and people losing their homes, but Marvel is still going to charge $3.99-$5.99 or so for the issues. I doubt I’m going to pick this up.
@George: Precisely.
@2bitspecialist: As long as the retcon remains in place, we are going to to keep bringing it up.
nice mickey mouse shirt joe
rolls eyes
I’d prefer the joke never have a basis for existing in the first place but as it is now it’s funny “because it’s true.” It’s not funny “ha ha.” It’s funny “God what a terrible mess.”
@George – It’s still not funny and the constant reminders are not fun either. Sorry. :/
I’m personally interested in this and; no offense to Bendis since I like his writing; I’m glad he isn’t writing another event book. It’s about time someone different wrote “the next big thing”.
Okay, even I’m slightly getting tired of hearing that.
“I hated OMD/BND/OMIT and everything, but even *I* think these “selling your marriage to the devil* jokes are wearing thin.”
I didn’t read it as a joke. I read it as a legit problem with the Brandnewverse Peter Parker.
How about fear of droping sales and losing your job as editer and chief
The next big thing…I am sick of the big things.
Seems like Civil War 2 tbh. In that Marvel tackles relevant issues…with SCIENCE!
I dunno, I believe in Matt Fraction so this shouldn’t be stupid, but no one ever demands that comic books tackle real world situations. So when it’s hyped up that they do, you get the feeling that there is a discernable disconnect between creators and their audience.
I hated OMD/BND/OMIT and everything, but even *I* think these “selling your marriage to the devil* jokes are wearing thin.
When he says that our heroes “represent the best of us.” Do you think he includes selling your marriage to the devil?