Here is a link to Newsarama’s current interview with Waid and Van Lente about “Red Headed Stranger” and Mary Jane’s return. Here are some important bullet points.
*We will find out who remembers what.
*This isn’t like the Paper Doll arc, Mary Jane is back for good.
*It looks like they’ll be following Roger Stern’s views and using Mary Jane as a complication in Peter’s life.
*Her portrayal will mirror the pre-marriage issues instead of her 90’s and 2000’s stuff according to Van Lente.
“Directly across the street from a police station…” Another masked Spidey robber, this time in Florida. This is considered the second robbery from the same criminal. From WESH’s Rikki Klaus in Orlando: Tuesday night’s target […]
Do you have an extra $42,000 sitting around? That’s the opening bid for an 8.0 edition of Amazing Fantasy #15 in an upcoming auction. Hundreds of comics were found in an abandoned basement in St. […]
Brad, Zach, JR, George, Mike and Ashley are doing their monthly team-up to discuss the previous month’s Spider-Titles, and to answer your questions, both live and and from the message board! Go to the Youtube […]
on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “By the way, what is with the dots an the word Now at the bottom of the review?” Nov 23, 09:23 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #11 (2024): “Ok, I finally did it. I sat down and caught up on the remaining eight issues of this rather than…” Nov 23, 09:22
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@Hornacek – Maybe Stan reserved the writer credit for himself.” Nov 18, 08:01
on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “In these older issues, why is the writer sometimes listed as “Scripter”? Is this like in a movie credits where…” Nov 17, 09:09 on Panel of the Day #1615 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I mean, eventually he’ll fall enough that he can web onto a building. This isn’t that dire a situation. Now…” Nov 17, 09:08 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I guess there was something different about Cindy Moon’s body chemistry, too.” Nov 11, 08:15 on Panel of the Day #1612 (Splash Page Sunday!): “I don’t like the whole “something was different with Peter’s body chemistry” explanation here. He was bitten by a spider…” Nov 11, 04:30
on 1994 Spider-Man #15: “Battle of the Insidious Six” Review: “Your complaints look like nitpicks and made-up. Why angry face should be indicative of seeing stone crushed?” Nov 10, 14:28 on Panel of the Day #1611: “I might be in the minority, but I’ve always been confused about Spider-man Noir’s wielding a gun.” Nov 8, 09:36 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #60 (Legacy #954): “Hit The Road, Zeb” or “All [REDACTED] Things Must Come To An End”: “@Paul Penna: I just don’t see any future writer “doing” anything with Paul besides having him around. Marvel wants him…” Nov 6, 09:19
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
Thank you for encouraging me to jump off 600 and never look back. Damn it. Marvel want to buther the character and developments these characters faces just to maintain a status qou or to draw in new readers without giving the middle finger to older fans.
Let’s not forget the famous Quesada Divas comment.
They want to give us EVERYTHING but what we want…
“Her portrayal will mirror the pre-marriage issues instead of her 90’s and 2000’s stuff according to Van Lente.”
What’s so “Brand New Day-ish” about that?
I shall continue to not support this book. And as always, they’ll continue to cancel any book they’re doing EXCEPT this one.
In the words of Marty McFly, “Perfect. Just perfect.” The party girl? Give me a f’in break! Bad idea, Van. REALLY bad idea. MJ’s grown since that tired old shell. Please rethink this before it goes to print. You’re ruining the character. DAMN YOU QUESADA!
Oh my god get a freaking EED, they are KILLING MJ! Peter and MJ are supposed to be the perfect couple, NOT “aware of eachothers flaws”! Unless they play the “MJ cares about Peter but knows he wont stop being Spidey” card (which is just under the Freak card in my deck…) its not even going to be herself anymore.
Miles, for all we know, she may not be able to lift herself from that couch without eating table.
I see Mj is back to her wavy 90S(mcfarlane athough looks more how bagely drew it) hair instead of the straight down romita hair. Is that guy in the picture in that cover is Peter, look too much of a bad boy snice drawn by scott campell, maybe is whatever douche celeb she’s banging.
That’s one curvy MJ.
How has she not broken in half yet?
Answers about OMD only a year and a half later, why not be really cool and wait a whole decade? At least the cover is pretty.
Well I’ve changed my mind. I’m not buying this issue.
yeah, I wonder they going to have her back in her party girl form which she supposly grew out of and mature or have her sleeping around with the current hotrod celeb douche. I like Fred and Mark but I’m wondering how marvel going to buthcer her character.